Ranieri V M, Suter P M, Tortorella C, De Tullio R, Dayer J M, Brienza A, Bruno F, Slutsky A S
Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università di Bari, Ospedale Policlinico, Italy.
JAMA. 1999 Jul 7;282(1):54-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.1.54.
Studies have shown that an inflammatory response may be elicited by mechanical ventilation used for recruitment or derecruitment of collapsed lung units or to overdistend alveolar regions, and that a lung-protective strategy may reduce this response.
To test the hypothesis that mechanical ventilation induces a pulmonary and systemic cytokine response that can be minimized by limiting recruitment or derecruitment and overdistention.
Randomized controlled trial in the intensive care units of 2 European hospitals from November 1995 to February 1998, with a 28-day follow-up.
Forty-four patients (mean [SD] age, 50 [18] years) with acute respiratory distress syndrome were enrolled, 7 of whom were withdrawn due to adverse events.
After admission, volume-pressure curves were measured and bronchoalveolar lavage and blood samples were obtained. Patients were randomized to either the control group (n = 19): tidal volume to obtain normal values of arterial carbon dioxide tension (35-40 mm Hg) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) producing the greatest improvement in arterial oxygen saturation without worsening hemodynamics; or the lung-protective strategy group (n = 18): tidal volume and PEEP based on the volume-pressure curve. Measurements were repeated 24 to 30 and 36 to 40 hours after randomization.
Pulmonary and systemic concentrations of inflammatory mediators approximately 36 hours after randomization.
Physiological characteristics and cytokine concentrations were similar in both groups at randomization. There were significant differences (mean [SD]) between the control and lung-protective strategy groups in tidal volume (11.1 [1.3] vs 7.6 [1.1] mL/kg), end-inspiratory plateau pressures (31.0 [4.5] vs 24.6 [2.4] cm H2O), and PEEP (6.5 [1.7] vs 14.8 [2.7] cm H2O) (P<.001). Patients in the control group had an increase in bronchoalveolar lavage concentrations of interleukin (IL) 1beta, IL-6, and IL-1 receptor agonist and in both bronchoalveolar lavage and plasma concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, IL-6, and TNF-alpha, receptors over 36 hours (P<.05 for all). Patients in the lung-protective strategy group had a reduction in bronchoalveolar lavage concentrations of polymorphonuclear cells, TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, soluble TNF-alpha receptor 55, and IL-8, and in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage concentrations of IL-6, soluble TNF-alpha receptor 75, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (P<.05). The concentration of the inflammatory mediators 36 hours after randomization was significantly lower in the lung-protective strategy group than in the control group (P<.05).
Mechanical ventilation can induce a cytokine response that may be attenuated by a strategy to minimize overdistention and recruitment/derecruitment of the lung. Whether these physiological improvements are associated with improvements in clinical end points should be determined in future studies.
研究表明,用于复张或解除塌陷肺单位或使肺泡区域过度扩张的机械通气可能引发炎症反应,而肺保护策略可能减轻这种反应。
检验以下假设,即机械通气会引发肺部和全身细胞因子反应,通过限制复张或解除塌陷以及过度扩张可将这种反应降至最低。
1995年11月至1998年2月在2家欧洲医院的重症监护病房进行的随机对照试验,随访28天。
纳入44例急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者(平均[标准差]年龄,50[18]岁),其中7例因不良事件退出。
入院后,测量容量-压力曲线并获取支气管肺泡灌洗样本和血样。患者被随机分为对照组(n = 19):潮气量以获得动脉二氧化碳分压正常值(35 - 40 mmHg),呼气末正压(PEEP)设定为在不恶化血流动力学的情况下使动脉血氧饱和度改善最大;或肺保护策略组(n = 18):根据容量-压力曲线设定潮气量和PEEP。随机分组后24至30小时以及36至40小时重复测量。
随机分组后约36小时肺部和全身炎症介质浓度。
随机分组时两组的生理特征和细胞因子浓度相似。对照组和肺保护策略组在潮气量(11.1[1.3] vs 7.6[1.1] mL/kg)、吸气末平台压(31.0[4.5] vs 24.6[2.4] cmH₂O)和PEEP(6.5[1.7] vs 14.8[2.7] cmH₂O)方面存在显著差异(P <.001)。对照组患者支气管肺泡灌洗中白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6和IL-1受体拮抗剂浓度升高,支气管肺泡灌洗和血浆中肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、IL-6和TNF-α受体浓度在36小时内均升高(所有P <.05)。肺保护策略组患者支气管肺泡灌洗中多形核细胞、TNF-α、IL-1β、可溶性TNF-α受体55和IL-8浓度降低,血浆和支气管肺泡灌洗中IL-6、可溶性TNF-α受体75和IL-1受体拮抗剂浓度降低(P <.05)。随机分组后36小时,肺保护策略组炎症介质浓度显著低于对照组(P <.05)。
机械通气可引发细胞因子反应,通过使肺过度扩张和复张/解除塌陷最小化的策略可使其减弱。这些生理改善是否与临床终点的改善相关,应在未来研究中确定。