Boyle Andrew J, Reddy Kiran, Conlon John, Auzinger Georg, Bannard-Smith Jonathan, Barrett Nicholas A, Camporota Luigi, Gillies Michael A, Jackson Colette, McDowell Clíona, Patel Brijesh, Perkins Gavin D, Szakmány Tamás, Tunnicliffe William, Welters Ingeborg D, McNamee James J, McAuley Daniel F, O'Kane Cecilia M
Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 27;7(4):e1246. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001246. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), the use of lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by veno-venous extracorporeal CO2 removal (vv-ECCO2R) does not improve clinical outcomes. The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate for differences in indices of systemic inflammation and ventilator-induced lung injury between patients treated with lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by vv-ECCO2R and standard care. Secondary objectives included an evaluation for heterogeneity of treatment effect.
Substudy of a randomized clinical trial.
Nine U.K. ICUs.
Moderate-to-severe AHRF (Pao2: Fio2 < 150mmHg [20ka]).
Plasma samples obtained at baseline and day 3.
The primary outcome was day 3 C-reactive protein (CRP). Clinical outcomes included 90-day mortality and ventilator-free days (VFD) until day 28. Exploratory analyses included an evaluation of plasma indices of lung injury, inflammation, and heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE). Seventy-nine patients were enrolled, and 69 patients had paired plasma samples taken at baseline and day 3. There was no difference in day 3 plasma CRP (intervention 138.6 [70.4, 189.4] vs. standard care 113.0 [62.7, 233.8] mg/L; p = 0.72). Between baseline and day 3, there was a greater increase in plasma interleukin-18 in patients that received intervention compared with those that received standard care (Δ 337.7 [-128.9, 738.9] vs. 6.4 [-457.2, 6.4] pg/mL p = 0.05). In patients with high interleukin-18, allocation to intervention was associated with increased VFDs (p = 0.03). Similarly in patients with a hyperinflammatory phenotype, the intervention was independently associated with increased VFDs (p < 0.01) and decreased 90-day mortality (p = 0.01).
In patients with moderate-to-severe AHRF, lower tidal volume ventilation, facilitated by vv-ECCO2R, was not associated with a difference in day 3 plasma CRP, but was associated with an increase in plasma interleukin-18 between baseline and day 3. Baseline plasma interleukin-18 and inflammatory phenotypes may identify subgroups of patients with moderate-to-severe AHRF that benefit from lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by vv-ECCO2R.
NCT02654327.
在急性低氧性呼吸衰竭(AHRF)患者中,采用静脉-静脉体外二氧化碳清除(vv-ECCO2R)辅助的低潮气量通气并不能改善临床结局。本分析的主要目的是评估接受vv-ECCO2R辅助的低潮气量通气治疗的患者与接受标准治疗的患者在全身炎症指标和呼吸机诱导性肺损伤方面的差异。次要目的包括评估治疗效果的异质性。
一项随机临床试验的子研究。
英国的9个重症监护病房。
中重度AHRF(动脉血氧分压:吸入氧分数<150mmHg[20kPa])。
在基线和第3天采集血浆样本。
主要结局指标为第3天的C反应蛋白(CRP)。临床结局包括90天死亡率和至第28天的无呼吸机天数(VFD)。探索性分析包括评估肺损伤、炎症的血浆指标以及治疗效果的异质性(HTE)。共纳入79例患者,其中69例患者在基线和第3天采集了配对的血浆样本。第3天血浆CRP无差异(干预组138.6[70.4,189.4]mg/L vs.标准治疗组113.0[62.7,233.8]mg/L;p = 0.72)。与接受标准治疗的患者相比,接受干预的患者在基线至第3天期间血浆白细胞介素-18升高幅度更大(Δ337.7[-128.9,738.9]pg/mL vs.6.4[-457.2,6.4]pg/mL,p = 为0.05)。在白细胞介素-18水平高的患者中,分配至干预组与VFD增加相关(p = 0.03)。同样,在具有高炎症表型的患者中,干预独立地与VFD增加相关(p<0.01)且90天死亡率降低(p = 0.01)。
在中重度AHRF患者中,vv-ECCO2R辅助的低潮气量通气与第3天血浆CRP无差异,但与基线至第3天血浆白细胞介素-18升高相关。基线血浆白细胞介素-18和炎症表型可能识别出中重度AHRF患者中受益于vv-ECCO2R辅助的低潮气量通气的亚组。
NCT02654327。