Grau A J, Brandt T, Buggle F, Orberk E, Mytilineos J, Werle E, Krause M, Winter R, Hacke W
Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Arch Neurol. 1999 Jul;56(7):851-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.7.851.
Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is an important cause of ischemic stroke in younger patients. However, its cause is insufficiently understood.
To test the hypothesis that CAD is frequently associated with recent infection.
We compared the prevalence of infection during the preceding week in 43 consecutive patients with acute CAD and 58 consecutive patients younger than 50 years with acute cerebral ischemia from other causes (control patients). In subgroups of patients, we correlated infectious status with electron microscopic studies of skin biopsy specimens and investigated pathways potentially linking infection and CAD.
Recent infection was more common in patients with CAD (25/43 [58.1%]) than in control patients (19/58 [32.8%]; P=.01). Respiratory tract infection was preponderant in both groups. Recent infection, but not the mechanical factors cough, sneezing, or vomiting, was independently associated with CAD in multivariate analysis. Investigation of serum antibodies against Chlamydia pneumoniae, smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, collagen types I through IV, and heat shock protein 65 and assessment of serum alpha1-antitrypsin and HLA did not contribute to the understanding of the pathogenesis of CAD. More patients with pathologic findings in skin biopsy specimens tended to have had a recent infection (13/21 [62%]) than patients without pathologic findings (2/9 [22%]; P=.11).
Our results suggest a significant association between recent infection and CAD that is not explained by mechanical factors occurring during infection.
颈内动脉夹层(CAD)是年轻患者缺血性卒中的重要病因。然而,其病因尚未完全明确。
验证CAD常与近期感染相关这一假说。
我们比较了43例连续性急性CAD患者和58例年龄小于50岁的连续性急性脑缺血其他病因患者(对照患者)前一周内感染的发生率。在亚组患者中,我们将感染状态与皮肤活检标本的电镜研究相关联,并研究了可能连接感染与CAD的途径。
CAD患者近期感染(25/43 [58.1%])比对照患者(19/58 [32.8%])更常见(P = 0.01)。两组中呼吸道感染均占优势。在多变量分析中,近期感染而非机械因素咳嗽、打喷嚏或呕吐与CAD独立相关。检测抗肺炎衣原体、平滑肌细胞、内皮细胞、Ⅰ至Ⅳ型胶原以及热休克蛋白65的血清抗体,以及评估血清α1 -抗胰蛋白酶和HLA,均无助于理解CAD的发病机制。皮肤活检标本有病理发现的患者比无病理发现的患者更易有近期感染(13/21 [62%] 比2/9 [22%];P = 0.11)。
我们的结果提示近期感染与CAD之间存在显著关联,这不能用感染期间发生的机械因素来解释。