• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国人类受精与胚胎学管理局。其对辅助生殖技术评估的贡献。

The U.K. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. How it has contributed to the evaluation of assisted reproduction technology.

作者信息

Doyle P

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Winter;15(1):3-10. doi: 10.1017/s0266462399015123.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462399015123
PMID:10407591
Abstract

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of the United Kingdom was passed in 1990, leading to the formation of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the first statutory body to regulate and control assisted conception anywhere in the world. The principal function of the HFEA is to license and monitor clinics that carry out in vitro fertilization (IVF), donor insemination (DI), and embryo research. Information on over 135,000 treatment cycles, 20,000 pregnancies, and 25,000 babies following IVF has now been collected as part of the regulatory process, and these data have permitted unbiased and accurate evaluation of treatment efficacy using pregnancy and live-birth rates. The treating clinics are required by law to provide information on the outcome of all births, including neonatal mortality and congenital malformations, but there is no systematic validation of these data using medical records or any follow-up of treated women, or babies, over time. In addition, the strict confidentiality of data supplied to the HFEA means that outside researchers have been unable to access the database for research projects. Thus, at the present time, it is not possible to evaluate the long-term safety of assisted conception procedures using HFEA data. There is reasonable scientific evidence to justify full investigation of the health of both treated women and resulting children. Particular health outcomes requiring evaluation include obstetric complications, preterm births, cerebral palsy, and cancer. The HFEA has recognized the need for follow-up studies and is currently investigating ways of enabling research projects using HFEA data to be undertaken.

摘要

英国的《人类受精与胚胎学法》于1990年通过,促成了人类受精与胚胎学管理局(HFEA)的成立,这是世界上首个对辅助受孕进行监管的法定机构。HFEA的主要职能是对开展体外受精(IVF)、供体授精(DI)及胚胎研究的诊所进行许可和监督。作为监管程序的一部分,现已收集了超过13.5万个IVF治疗周期、2万次妊娠及2.5万名婴儿出生的相关信息,这些数据使得能够利用妊娠率和活产率对治疗效果进行公正且准确的评估。法律要求治疗诊所提供所有出生情况的信息,包括新生儿死亡率和先天性畸形,但并未使用病历对这些数据进行系统验证,也未对接受治疗的女性或婴儿进行长期随访。此外,提供给HFEA的数据严格保密,这意味着外部研究人员无法访问该数据库用于研究项目。因此,目前无法利用HFEA的数据评估辅助受孕程序的长期安全性。有合理的科学证据表明有必要对接受治疗的女性及其所育子女的健康进行全面调查。需要评估的特定健康结果包括产科并发症、早产、脑瘫和癌症。HFEA已认识到进行随访研究的必要性,目前正在研究如何开展利用HFEA数据的研究项目。

相似文献

1
The U.K. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. How it has contributed to the evaluation of assisted reproduction technology.英国人类受精与胚胎学管理局。其对辅助生殖技术评估的贡献。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Winter;15(1):3-10. doi: 10.1017/s0266462399015123.
2
Sharing genetic origins information in donor assisted conception: views from licensed centres on HFEA donor information form (91) 4.在供体辅助生殖中分享基因起源信息:来自人类受精与胚胎学管理局(HFEA)供体信息表许可中心的观点(91) 4。
Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3274-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3274.
3
Births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception, 1978-87. MRC Working Party on Children Conceived by In Vitro Fertilisation.1978 - 1987年英国辅助生殖的出生情况。医学研究委员会体外受精受孕儿童工作小组。
BMJ. 1990 May 12;300(6734):1229-33. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6734.1229.
4
Recent deliberations on the case of human fetal oocytes and on pregnancies in post-menopausal women by the British Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
Hum Reprod. 1995 Jan;10(1):239-44.
5
'Not so wrong that we are prepared to threaten the entire service': the regulation of reproductive technologies in the UK.“错得还不至于让我们准备去威胁整个服务体系”:英国生殖技术的监管
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2001;7(2):45-51. doi: 10.1179/hrge.7.2.xvw34678056261v7.
6
Regulation before the HFEA.人类受精与胚胎学管理局成立之前的监管。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2005 Jun;8(2):61-2. doi: 10.1080/14647270500030738.
7
Live birth and perinatal outcomes following stimulated and unstimulated IVF: analysis of over two decades of a nationwide data.刺激与未刺激体外受精后的活产及围产期结局:基于全国范围二十多年数据的分析
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2261-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew184. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
8
What HFEA did (in its first year).
Bull Med Ethics. 1992 Nov;No. 83:17-8.
9
The UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990--how well is it functioning?1990年英国《人类受精与胚胎学法案》——其运行情况如何?
Hum Reprod. 1994 Sep;9(9):1779-82. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138794.
10
Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.人类辅助生殖后的妊娠结局
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jan;36(1):64-83. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30685-X.

引用本文的文献

1
'I haven't met them, I don't have any trust in them. It just feels like a big unknown': a qualitative study exploring the determinants of consent to use Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority registry data in research.“我没有见过他们,也不信任他们。这感觉就像是一个巨大的未知数”:一项定性研究,探讨了同意在研究中使用人类受精和胚胎管理局登记数据的决定因素。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 30;9(5):e026469. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026469.
2
Comparing the burden: what can we learn by comparing regulatory frameworks in abortion and fertility services?比较负担:通过比较堕胎和生育服务的监管框架,我们能学到什么?
Health Care Anal. 2013 Dec;21(4):338-54. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0196-6.
3
Accreditation, supervision, and regulation of ART clinics in India--a distant dream?
印度辅助生殖技术诊所的认证、监督与管理——遥不可及的梦想?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003 Jul;20(7):276-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1024510520899.