• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在供体辅助生殖中分享基因起源信息:来自人类受精与胚胎学管理局(HFEA)供体信息表许可中心的观点(91) 4。

Sharing genetic origins information in donor assisted conception: views from licensed centres on HFEA donor information form (91) 4.

作者信息

Blyth E, Hunt J

机构信息

School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, UK.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3274-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3274.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.11.3274
PMID:9853894
Abstract

Section 31 of the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act 1990 permits people born as a result of licensed treatments provided in the UK to seek certain information about their genetic origins held on the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) Register of Information. The precise nature of such information is to be specified in Regulations that have yet to be determined by the Secretary of State. The Register comprises data submitted to the Authority by licensed centres on HFEA Donor Information Form (91) 4. This paper reports on a survey of views of licensed centres concerning the adequacy of this form and centres' experiences of gathering information from donors. The survey shows that centres' experiences vary considerably, and the authors argue that there is a case for the sharing of centres' experiences and dissemination of effective strategies. The paper further discusses the nature of information that might become available to individuals seeking information from the HFEA. While requests for non-identifying information concerning the donor cannot be made prior to 2010, any information made available then is inevitably dependent on current practice in centres. The authors conclude that current variability in practice does not best serve the interests of donor offspring who may seek information about their genetic origins.

摘要

1990年《人类受精与胚胎学法》第31条允许因在英国接受许可治疗而出生的人,获取人类受精与胚胎管理局(HFEA)信息登记册中保存的有关其基因起源的某些信息。此类信息的确切性质将在国务大臣尚未确定的法规中予以明确。该登记册包含许可中心按照HFEA捐赠者信息表(91)4提交给管理局的数据。本文报告了一项关于许可中心对该表格的充分性以及中心从捐赠者收集信息的经验的观点调查。调查显示,各中心的经验差异很大,作者认为有必要分享各中心的经验并传播有效策略。本文还进一步讨论了可能提供给从HFEA获取信息的个人的信息性质。虽然在2010年之前不能要求提供有关捐赠者的非识别信息,但届时提供的任何信息不可避免地取决于各中心目前的做法。作者得出结论,目前做法的差异并不能最好地服务于可能寻求有关其基因起源信息的捐赠者后代的利益。

相似文献

1
Sharing genetic origins information in donor assisted conception: views from licensed centres on HFEA donor information form (91) 4.在供体辅助生殖中分享基因起源信息:来自人类受精与胚胎学管理局(HFEA)供体信息表许可中心的观点(91) 4。
Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3274-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3274.
2
Family building using donated gametes and embryos in the UK: recommendations for policy and practice on behalf of the British Infertility Counselling Association and the British Fertility Society in collaboration with the Association of Clinical Embryologists and the Royal College of Nurses Fertility Nurses Forum.英国利用捐赠配子和胚胎组建家庭:代表英国不孕不育咨询协会和英国生育协会,与临床胚胎学家协会及皇家护理学院生育护理论坛合作制定的政策与实践建议
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2014 Mar;17(1):1-10. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2013.862041. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
3
A survey of semen donation: phase I--the view of UK licensed centres.一项关于精液捐赠的调查:第一阶段——英国持牌机构的观点。
Hum Reprod. 1994 May;9(5):882-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138611.
4
The U.K. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. How it has contributed to the evaluation of assisted reproduction technology.英国人类受精与胚胎学管理局。其对辅助生殖技术评估的贡献。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Winter;15(1):3-10. doi: 10.1017/s0266462399015123.
5
Legal and ethical responsibilities of gamete banks.配子库的法律与伦理责任。
Hum Reprod. 1998 May;13 Suppl 2:80-3; discussion 84-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_2.80.
6
The management of genetic origins: secrecy and openness in donor assisted conception in Israel and elsewhere.遗传起源的管理:以色列及其他地区供体辅助生殖中的保密与公开
Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3268-73. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3268.
7
A survey of semen donation: phase II--the view of the donors.一项关于精液捐赠的调查:第二阶段——捐赠者的观点。
Hum Reprod. 1995 Apr;10(4):951-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136069.
8
The UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990--how well is it functioning?1990年英国《人类受精与胚胎学法案》——其运行情况如何?
Hum Reprod. 1994 Sep;9(9):1779-82. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138794.
9
Donor conception and sharing of genetic information.供体受孕与遗传信息共享
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):994. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70279-0.
10
Would 'all-inclusive' compensation attract more gamete donors to balance their loss of anonymity?“全方位”补偿会吸引更多配子捐赠者来平衡他们匿名性的丧失吗?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Mar;10(3):301-6. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61787-7.

引用本文的文献

1
To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.是否要公开捐精者的身份?取消捐精者匿名制所引发的社会和伦理问题概述。
Asian J Androl. 2010 Nov;12(6):801-6. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.60. Epub 2010 Jul 12.