• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们能否衡量医疗保健的社会重要性?

Can we measure the social importance of health care?

作者信息

Buck D, Eastwood A, Smith P C

机构信息

University of London.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Winter;15(1):89-107. doi: 10.1017/s0266462399015196.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462399015196
PMID:10407598
Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which it is possible to measure the social importance, or macro benefits, of health care. In contrast to the many micro studies of the benefits of specific health care interventions, methodology relating to such macro benefits is at a very rudimentary stage. A theoretical model is presented that seeks to capture the social consequences of a health care system. In light of this model, three existing empirical approaches to answering the question are examined: the inventory approach, the avoidable mortality approach, and the production function approach. All three have severe limitations in terms of the underlying theoretical model, data availability, and analytic tools employed. A more fruitful approach may be to investigate the value of undertaking a direct survey of citizens' attitudes toward their health care system.

摘要

本文探讨了衡量医疗保健的社会重要性或宏观效益的可能性。与众多关于特定医疗保健干预措施效益的微观研究不同,与这种宏观效益相关的方法尚处于非常初级的阶段。本文提出了一个理论模型,旨在捕捉医疗保健系统的社会后果。基于该模型,考察了三种现有的回答该问题的实证方法:清单法、可避免死亡率法和生产函数法。这三种方法在基础理论模型、数据可用性和所使用的分析工具方面都有严重局限性。一种更有成效的方法可能是调查直接对公民对其医疗保健系统的态度进行调查的价值。

相似文献

1
Can we measure the social importance of health care?我们能否衡量医疗保健的社会重要性?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Winter;15(1):89-107. doi: 10.1017/s0266462399015196.
2
Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.规划研究重点中的公民陪审团:过程、参与度与结果
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):272-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00502.x.
3
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
4
Variations in avoidable mortality and variations in health care resources.可避免死亡率的差异与医疗保健资源的差异。
Lancet. 1987 Apr 4;1(8536):789-92. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92810-8.
5
On the methodological, theoretical and philosophical context of health inequalities research: a critique.论健康不平等研究的方法学、理论和哲学背景:一项批判
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Sep;53(6):801-16. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00383-x.
6
On the societal value of health care: what do we know about the person trade-off technique?论医疗保健的社会价值:我们对个人权衡技术了解多少?
Health Econ. 2001 Apr;10(3):233-43. doi: 10.1002/hec.581.
7
Trust relations in health care: developing a theoretical framework for the "new" NHS.医疗保健中的信任关系:为“新”国民医疗服务体系构建理论框架
J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(5):376-96. doi: 10.1108/14777260610701777.
8
Social conditions and self-management are more powerful determinants of health than access to care.社会条件和自我管理对健康的决定作用比获得医疗服务更为强大。
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Sep 1;129(5):406-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-5-199809010-00011.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Should non-citizens have access to publicly funded health care?: a study of public attitudes and their affecting factors.非公民是否应享有公共资助的医疗保健服务?:公众态度及其影响因素研究
Public Health. 2015 Sep;129(9):1157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.033. Epub 2015 Aug 20.