Xie X M, Geacintov N E, Broyde S
Chemistry and Biology Departments, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Chem Res Toxicol. 1999 Jul;12(7):597-609. doi: 10.1021/tx990021a.
The two enantiomeric metabolites of the carcinogen precursor benzo[a]pyrene, (+)- and (-)-anti-BPDE [(7R,8S)-dihydroxy-(9S, 10R)-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene and the corresponding 7S,8R,9R,10S enantiomer, respectively], bind predominantly to the exocyclic amino groups of dG residues in double-stranded DNA by either cis or trans addition to yield four stereoisomerically distinct [BP]-N(2)-dG adducts. Both the 10S (+)-trans and 10R (-)-transadducts assume minor groove conformations in normal, full duplexes, but with opposite 5' or 3' orientations, respectively, relative to the modified strand. In contrast, the 10R (+)-cis and 10S (-)-cis adducts assume oppositely oriented base-displaced intercalative conformations in normal duplexes, with the inserted pyrenyl residues pointing toward the major groove in the (+)-cis isomer and toward the minor groove in the (-)-cis isomer. A BPDE-modified nucleoside is a small system which can be studied by computational methods with a very thorough survey of the potential energy surface. To investigate conformational differences between cis and trans adducts, and to elucidate origins governing the opposite orientations of these (+)- and (-)-diol epoxide adducts, we have carried out extensive investigations of the (+)- and (-)-trans-anti- and (+)- and (-)-cis-anti-[BP]-N(2)-dG deoxynucleoside adduct pairs. We report results for the (+)- and (-)-cis-anti pair, and compare them with the (+)- and (-)-trans-anti adducts. We created 373 248 different conformers for each adduct, which uniformly sampled at 5 degrees intervals the possible rotamers about three flexible torsion angles governing base (chi) and carcinogen (alpha' and beta') orientations, and computed each of their energies. The potential energy surface of the molecule was then mapped from these results. While four potential energy wells or structural domains are found for the (+)-trans adduct and four for the (-)-trans adduct, only two of these four domains are favored for each of the two cis adducts. In both cis and trans adducts, the (+)/(-) pairs of each structural domain are nearly mirror images. The most favored of the domains in both cis and trans adducts is observed experimentally in the duplexes containing each of these [BP]-N(2)-dG lesions. The opposite orientations in both cis and trans adducts stem from steric crowding at the benzylic ring, engendered when a (+) stereoisomer is rotated into the analogous conformation of its (-) partner, and vice versa. Furthermore, the key role of the difference in absolute configuration between trans and cis adducts at the hydroxyls of C9 and C8 in governing conformational preferences and flexibility is delineated. Cis adducts are less conformationally flexible than trans adducts because they are inherently more sterically crowded, with C9-OH and C8-OH on the same side of the benzylic ring as guanine and sugar, while they are on the opposite side of the benzylic ring in the trans adducts. Consequently, the cis adducts inherently favor less the minor groove position adopted by trans adducts in DNA duplexes because the C9-OH and C8-OH are directed inward into the minor groove in the cis adducts. In the trans adducts, the C9-OH and C8-OH are directed outward, away from the interior of the minor groove. Observed differential processing of these four adducts by replication, repair, and transcription enzymes may well stem from their differing conformational preferences.
致癌物前体苯并[a]芘的两种对映体代谢物,(+)-和(-)-反式苯并[a]芘二醇环氧化物[(7R,8S)-二羟基-(9S,10R)-环氧-7,8,9,10-四氢苯并[a]芘和相应的7S,8R,9R,10S对映体],主要通过顺式或反式加成与双链DNA中dG残基的环外氨基结合,产生四种立体异构不同的[苯并[a]芘]-N(2)-dG加合物。在正常的完全双链体中,10S(+)-反式和10R(-)-反式加合物均呈现小沟构象,但相对于修饰链,它们分别具有相反的5'或3'方向。相比之下,10R(+)-顺式和10S(-)-顺式加合物在正常双链体中呈现相反方向的碱基移位插入构象,插入的芘基残基在(+)-顺式异构体中指向大沟,而在(-)-顺式异构体中指向小沟。苯并[a]芘二醇环氧化物修饰的核苷是一个小体系,可以通过计算方法对其势能面进行非常全面的研究。为了研究顺式和反式加合物之间的构象差异,并阐明控制这些(+)-和(-)-二醇环氧化物加合物相反方向的原因,我们对(+)-和(-)-反式-反式-和(+)-和(-)-顺式-反式-[苯并[a]芘]-N(2)-dG脱氧核苷加合物对进行了广泛研究。我们报告了(+)-和(-)-顺式-反式对的结果,并将它们与(+)-和(-)-反式-反式加合物进行比较。我们为每个加合物创建了373248种不同的构象,以5度间隔均匀采样围绕控制碱基(χ)和致癌物(α'和β')方向的三个柔性扭转角的可能旋转异构体,并计算它们各自的能量。然后根据这些结果绘制分子的势能面。虽然在(+)-反式加合物中发现了四个势能阱或结构域,在(-)-反式加合物中也发现了四个,但对于两种顺式加合物中的每一种,这四个结构域中只有两个是有利的。在顺式和反式加合物中,每个结构域的(+)/(-)对几乎是镜像。在含有这些[苯并[a]芘]-N(2)-dG损伤的双链体中,通过实验观察到顺式和反式加合物中最有利的结构域。顺式和反式加合物中的相反方向源于苄基环处的空间拥挤,当(+)立体异构体旋转到其(-)对映体的类似构象时就会产生这种拥挤,反之亦然。此外,还描述了反式和顺式加合物在C9和C8羟基处绝对构型差异在控制构象偏好和灵活性方面的关键作用。顺式加合物的构象灵活性比反式加合物小,因为它们本质上空间拥挤程度更高,C9-OH和C8-OH与鸟嘌呤和糖在苄基环的同一侧,而在反式加合物中它们在苄基环的相反侧。因此,顺式加合物本质上不太倾向于反式加合物在DNA双链体中所采用的小沟位置,因为在顺式加合物中C9-OH和C8-OH向内指向小沟。在反式加合物中,C9-OH和C8-OH向外指向,远离小沟内部。观察到复制、修复和转录酶对这四种加合物的不同处理方式很可能源于它们不同的构象偏好。