• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of two strategies for intensifying antihypertensive treatment: low-dose combination (enalapril + felodipine ER) versus increased dose of monotherapy (enalapril). LEVEL (Lexxel vs Enalapril) Study Group.

作者信息

Elliott W J, Montoro R, Smith D, Leibowitz M, Hwang C, Gradman A H, Schleman M, Klibaner M

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1999 Jul;12(7):691-6. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00051-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00051-5
PMID:10411366
Abstract

To compare two popular strategies for intensifying treatment for hypertension, a double-blind, randomized, prospective, parallel-group, and partial crossover study was done. After 2 weeks of placebo run-in (baseline) and 3 weeks of 5 mg enalapril once daily, 217 patients were randomized to 6 weeks of treatment with either a low-dose combination therapy (5 mg enalapril + 5 mg felodipine ER once daily, Lexxel, Astra Merck, Inc.), or a higher dose of monotherapy (10 mg enalapril once daily, Vasotec, Merck & Co., Inc.). The group randomized to the combination had significantly greater reductions in sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP)--14.2/10.6 mm Hg compared with baseline versus 9.6/7.4 mm Hg (P < .05/.01)--as well as a greater percentage of patients having achieved either diastolic BP < 90 mm Hg or a decline of at least 10 mm Hg (responders), 59% v 41% (P < .01). When patients originally taking 10 mg enalapril were crossed over to the combination therapy for a further 6 weeks, there was a further BP reduction and increase in response rate, with loss of significant differences compared with those treated continuously with the combination for the entire 12 weeks. The greater BP-lowering efficacy of the combination was independent of age, gender, and race. There were no significant differences in tolerability between the regimens. These data support the hypothesis that in patients who do not achieve goal BP reduction with a low dose of an antihypertensive agent, a combination of two drugs with complementary mechanisms of action is more effective than increasing the dose of the first agent.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of two strategies for intensifying antihypertensive treatment: low-dose combination (enalapril + felodipine ER) versus increased dose of monotherapy (enalapril). LEVEL (Lexxel vs Enalapril) Study Group.
Am J Hypertens. 1999 Jul;12(7):691-6. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00051-5.
2
Combined enalapril and felodipine extended release (ER) for systemic hypertension. Enalapril-Felodipine ER Factorial Study Group.依那普利与缓释非洛地平联合治疗系统性高血压。依那普利 - 非洛地平缓释片析因研究组。
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Feb 15;79(4):431-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00781-3.
3
Improved efficacy with maintained tolerability in the treatment of primary hypertension. Comparison between the felodipine-metoprolol combination tablet and monotherapy with enalapril. Swedish Multicentre Group.非洛地平-美托洛尔复方片剂与依那普利单药治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:疗效提高且耐受性良好。瑞典多中心研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Jan;13(1):55-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000724.
4
Long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the combination of enalapril and felodipine ER in the treatment of hypertension. Enalapril-Felodipine ER Factorial Study Group.依那普利与非洛地平缓释片联合治疗高血压的长期疗效、耐受性及安全性。依那普利-非洛地平缓释片析因研究组。
Clin Ther. 1998 May-Jun;20(3):527-38. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80062-3.
5
Evaluation of blood pressure response to the combination of enalapril (single dose) and diltiazem ER (four different doses) in systemic hypertension.依那普利(单剂量)与缓释地尔硫䓬(四种不同剂量)联合用药对系统性高血压患者血压反应的评估。
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Jul 1;78(1):51-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00226-3.
6
A factorial study of combination hypertension treatment with metoprolol succinate extended release and felodipine extended release results of the Metoprolol Succinate-Felodipine Antihypertension Combination Trial (M-FACT).美托洛尔琥珀酸盐缓释片与非洛地平缓释片联合治疗高血压的析因研究——美托洛尔琥珀酸盐-非洛地平抗高血压联合试验(M-FACT)结果
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Apr;19(4):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.007.
7
Felodipine-metoprolol combination tablet: a valuable option to initiate antihypertensive therapy?非洛地平-美托洛尔复方片剂:启动抗高血压治疗的一个有价值的选择?
Am J Hypertens. 1999 Sep;12(9 Pt 1):915-20. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00067-9.
8
The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a low dose combination of ramipril and felodipine ER in mild to moderate essential hypertension.雷米普利与缓释非洛地平低剂量联合用药治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的降压疗效及耐受性
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Oct;36(4):323-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb00371.x.
9
Differential effects of enalapril-felodipine versus enalapril-lercanidipine combination drug treatment on sympathetic nerve traffic and metabolic profile in obesity-related hypertension.依那普利-非洛地平与依那普利-乐卡地平联合用药治疗对肥胖相关性高血压患者交感神经活动及代谢指标的不同影响
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 Mar;10(3):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
10
Manidipine versus enalapril monotherapy in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 24-week study.马尼地平与依那普利单药治疗高血压合并2型糖尿病患者的多中心、随机、双盲、24周研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Feb;27(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.02.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of fixed-dose amlodipine and losartan combination compared with amlodipine monotherapy in stage 2 hypertension: a randomized, double blind, multicenter study.氨氯地平与氯沙坦固定剂量联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗在2级高血压中的疗效比较:一项随机、双盲、多中心研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Oct 28;4:461. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-461.
2
Is fixed combination therapy appropriate for initial hypertension treatment?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2002 Aug;4(4):278-85. doi: 10.1007/s11906-996-0005-z.