Suppr超能文献

急性肺损伤患者的容量性二氧化碳描记法:呼气末正压的影响

Volumetric capnography in patients with acute lung injury: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure.

作者信息

Blanch L, Lucangelo U, Lopez-Aguilar J, Fernandez R, Romero P V

机构信息

Servei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital de Sabadell, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1999 May;13(5):1048-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13e19.x.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyse the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on volumetric capnography and respiratory system mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients. Eight normal subjects (control group), nine patients with moderate acute lung injury (ALI group) and eight patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS group) were studied. Respiratory system mechanics, alveolar ejection volume as a fraction of tidal volume (VAE/VT), phase III slopes of expired CO2 beyond VAE and Bohr's dead space (VD/VT(Bohr)) at different levels of PEEP were measured. No differences in respiratory system resistances were found between the ALI and ARDS groups. VD/VT(Bohr) and expired CO2 slope beyond VAE were higher in ALI patients (0.52+/-0.01 and 13.9+/-0.7 mmHg x L(-1), respectively) compared with control patients (0.46+/-0.01 and 7.7+/-0.4 mmHg x L(-1), p<0.01, respectively) and in ARDS patients (0.61+/-0.02 and 24.9+/-1.6 mmHg x L(-1), p<0.01, respectively) compared with ALI patients. VAE/VT differed similarly (0.6+/-0.01 in control group, 0.43+/-0.01 in ALI group and 0.31+/-0.01 in ARDS group, p<0.01). PEEP had no effect on VAE/VT, expired CO2 slope beyond VAE and VD/VT(Bohr) in any group. A significant correlation (p<0.01) was found between VAE/VT and expired CO2 slope beyond VAE and lung injury score at zero PEEP. Indices of volumetric capnography are affected by the severity of the lung injury, but are unmodified by the application of positive end-expiratory pressure.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析呼气末正压(PEEP)对机械通气患者容量式二氧化碳描记法及呼吸系统力学的影响。研究对象包括8名正常受试者(对照组)、9名中度急性肺损伤患者(ALI组)和8名急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者(ARDS组)。测量了不同PEEP水平下的呼吸系统力学、肺泡呼出量占潮气量的比例(VAE/VT)、VAE之后呼出二氧化碳的III期斜率以及Bohr死腔(VD/VT(Bohr))。ALI组和ARDS组之间的呼吸系统阻力无差异。与对照组患者(分别为0.46±0.01和7.7±0.4 mmHg·L⁻¹,p<0.01)相比,ALI患者的VD/VT(Bohr)和VAE之后呼出二氧化碳的斜率更高(分别为0.52±0.01和13.9±0.7 mmHg·L⁻¹);与ALI患者相比,ARDS患者的VD/VT(Bohr)和VAE之后呼出二氧化碳的斜率也更高(分别为0.61±0.02和24.9±1.6 mmHg·L⁻¹,p<0.01)。VAE/VT也有类似差异(对照组为0.6±0.01,ALI组为0.43±0.01,ARDS组为0.31±0.01,p<0.01)。PEEP对任何组的VAE/VT、VAE之后呼出二氧化碳的斜率和VD/VT(Bohr)均无影响。在零PEEP时,VAE/VT与VAE之后呼出二氧化碳的斜率及肺损伤评分之间存在显著相关性(p<0.01)。容量式二氧化碳描记法指标受肺损伤严重程度影响,但不受呼气末正压应用的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验