Chen B P, White C M, Fan C, Kluger J, Chow M S
Drug Information Center, Hartford Hospital, Connecticut 06102-5037, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 1999 Jul;19(7):832-7. doi: 10.1592/phco.19.10.832.31564.
We evaluated the antifibrillatory effect of two different doses of amiodarone after cardiac arrest with a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) model in 19 pigs. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by pacing the right ventricle using a primary drive train at a cycle length of 270 msec for 8 beats. The minimum current strength necessary to induce sustained ventricular fibrillation was defined as the ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) measured in mA. Three VFT determinations were made at baseline, followed by 9 minutes of continuous CPR with two determinations of VFT, and three after stabilization. The pigs were placed into one of three groups: amiodarone 2 or 5 mg/kg, or placebo. The average poststabilization VFT in each group was compared with the average baseline VFT. Pigs receiving amiodarone 2 mg/kg had significantly higher VFT after stabilization than at baseline (22.88+/-12.76 to 27.10+/-10.18 mA, p=0.048), as did those receiving 5 mg/kg (17.03+/-7.01 to 28.08+/-11.58 mA, p=0.002). The deltaVFT was significantly greater with amiodarone 5 mg/kg than with vehicle (placebo), but not with 2 mg/kg. There were no changes in VFT in any group during CPR versus baseline. When active treatments were combined, the trend was toward better survival in the amiodarone groups (13/13) compared with the placebo group (4/6, p=0.076).
我们在19头猪的心肺复苏(CPR)模型上评估了两种不同剂量胺碘酮对心脏骤停后的抗纤颤作用。通过使用初级驱动链以270毫秒的周期长度起搏右心室8次来诱发心室颤动。将诱发持续性心室颤动所需的最小电流强度定义为以毫安为单位测量的心室颤动阈值(VFT)。在基线时进行三次VFT测定,随后进行9分钟的持续CPR并进行两次VFT测定,稳定后再进行三次。将猪分为三组之一:胺碘酮2或5mg/kg,或安慰剂。将每组稳定后的平均VFT与平均基线VFT进行比较。接受2mg/kg胺碘酮的猪在稳定后的VFT显著高于基线(22.88±12.76至27.10±10.18mA,p=0.048),接受5mg/kg的猪也是如此(17.03±7.01至28.08±11.58mA,p=0.002)。5mg/kg胺碘酮组的VFT变化量显著大于载体(安慰剂)组,但2mg/kg组则不然。与基线相比,CPR期间任何组的VFT均无变化。当将活性治疗组合时,胺碘酮组(13/13)的生存趋势优于安慰剂组(4/6,p=0.076)。