Guy C N, ffytche D H, Brovelli A, Chumillas J
Physics Department, Imperial College, London, SW7 2BZ.
Neuroimage. 1999 Aug;10(2):125-48. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0462.
EEG/VEP and fMRI responses to periodic visual stimulation are reported. The purpose of these experiments was to look for similar patterns in the time series produced by each method to help understand the relationship between the two. The stimulation protocol was the same for both sets of experiments and consisted of five complete cycles of checkerboard pattern reversal at 1.87 Hz for 30 s followed by 30 s of a stationary checkerboard. The fMRI data was analyzed using standard methods, while the EEG was analyzed with a new measurement of activation-the VEPEG. Both VEPEG and fMRI time series contain the fundamental frequency of the stimulus and quasi harmonic components-an unexplained double frequency commonly found in fMRI data. These results have prompted a reappraisal of the methods for analyzing fMRI data and have suggested a connection between our findings and much older published invasive electrophysiological measurements of blood flow and the partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide. Overall our new analysis suggests that fMRI signals are strongly dependant on hydraulic blood flow effects. We distinguish three categories of fMRI signal corresponding to: focal activated regions of brain tissue; diffuse nonspecific regions of steal; and major cerebral vessels of arterial supply or venous drainage. Each category of signal has its own finger print in frequency, amplitude, and phase. Finally, we put forward the hypothesis that modulations in blood flow are not only the consequence but are also the cause of modulations in functional activity.
报告了脑电图/视觉诱发电位(EEG/VEP)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)对周期性视觉刺激的反应。这些实验的目的是在每种方法产生的时间序列中寻找相似模式,以帮助理解两者之间的关系。两组实验的刺激方案相同,包括以1.87赫兹的频率进行五个完整周期的棋盘格图案反转,持续30秒,随后是30秒的静止棋盘格。fMRI数据使用标准方法进行分析,而EEG则采用一种新的激活测量方法——视觉诱发电位脑电图(VEPEG)进行分析。VEPEG和fMRI时间序列都包含刺激的基频和准谐波成分——一种在fMRI数据中常见但无法解释的双频。这些结果促使人们重新评估fMRI数据的分析方法,并表明我们的发现与更早发表的关于血流以及氧气和二氧化碳分压的侵入性电生理测量之间存在联系。总体而言,我们的新分析表明fMRI信号强烈依赖于水力血流效应。我们区分了三类fMRI信号,分别对应:脑组织的局灶性激活区域;盗血的弥漫性非特异性区域;以及动脉供应或静脉引流的主要脑血管。每类信号在频率、幅度和相位上都有其独特特征。最后,我们提出假设,即血流调制不仅是功能活动调制的结果,也是其原因。