• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左旋布比卡因与布比卡因抗菌活性的比较:一项针对与硬膜外感染相关细菌的体外研究。

A comparison of the antibacterial activity of levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine: an in vitro study with bacteria implicated in epidural infection.

作者信息

Hodson M, Gajraj R, Scott N B

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Health Care International (Scotland) Ltd, Beardmore Street, Clydebank, Glasgow G81 4DY, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1999 Jul;54(7):699-702. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00742.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00742.x
PMID:10417467
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the antibacterial activity of bupivacaine with levobupivacaine against a range of bacteria implicated in epidural infection to determine whether any differences existed between the two drugs. Concentrations of 0.125%, 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine and levobupivacaine were inoculated with suspensions of either Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus or Enterococcus faecalis. After incubation, the mixtures were plated onto blood agar and colony counts were recorded after a further period of incubation. The minimum bactericidal concentration of local anaesthetic against the three bacteria studied was found to be 0.25% for bupivacaine and 0.5% for levobupivacaine showing racemic bupivacaine to have a more potent antibacterial action than levobupivacaine. This finding suggests that the dextrobupivacaine isomer of racemic bupivacaine has a more potent antibacterial action than the levobupivacaine isomer.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较布比卡因和左旋布比卡因对一系列与硬膜外感染相关细菌的抗菌活性,以确定这两种药物之间是否存在差异。将浓度为0.125%、0.25%和0.5%的布比卡因和左旋布比卡因分别与表皮葡萄球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌或粪肠球菌的悬液接种。孵育后,将混合物接种到血琼脂平板上,再经过一段时间孵育后记录菌落计数。结果发现,布比卡因对所研究的三种细菌的最低杀菌浓度为0.25%,左旋布比卡因为0.5%,表明消旋布比卡因比左旋布比卡因具有更强的抗菌作用。这一发现表明,消旋布比卡因的右旋布比卡因异构体比左旋布比卡因异构体具有更强的抗菌作用。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the antibacterial activity of levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine: an in vitro study with bacteria implicated in epidural infection.左旋布比卡因与布比卡因抗菌活性的比较:一项针对与硬膜外感染相关细菌的体外研究。
Anaesthesia. 1999 Jul;54(7):699-702. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00742.x.
2
Antibacterial activity of epidural infusions.硬膜外输注的抗菌活性。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 Jan;37(1):66-9.
3
Levobupivacaine hydrochloride and sufentanil have no antimicrobial effect at 25 degrees C in vitro.盐酸左旋布比卡因和舒芬太尼在25摄氏度体外环境下无抗菌作用。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Jul;24(7):634-9. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507000026. Epub 2007 Mar 5.
4
A comparison of epidural levobupivacaine 0.75% with racemic bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgery.0.75%左旋布比卡因与消旋布比卡因用于下腹部手术的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):642-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00026.
5
Bactericidal activity of 0.5% bupivacaine with preservatives on microorganisms in the human skin flora.含防腐剂的0.5%布比卡因对人体皮肤菌群中微生物的杀菌活性。
Reg Anesth. 1997 Mar-Apr;22(2):178-84. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(06)80038-6.
6
Comparison of the effects of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine on ventricular conduction, refractoriness, and wavelength: an epicardial mapping study.消旋布比卡因、左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因对心室传导、不应期和波长影响的比较:一项心外膜标测研究
Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):641-50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00021.
7
Bactericidal activity of preservative-free bupivacaine on microorganisms in the human skin flora.不含防腐剂的布比卡因对人体皮肤菌群中微生物的杀菌活性。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Oct;42(9):1096-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05383.x.
8
Sufentanil modifies the antibacterial activity of bupivacaine and ropivacaine.舒芬太尼可改变布比卡因和罗哌卡因的抗菌活性。
Can J Anaesth. 2004 Nov;51(9):911-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03018889.
9
Comparative somatic and visceral antinociception and neurotoxicity of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and dextrobupivacaine in rats.大鼠鞘内注射布比卡因、左旋布比卡因和右旋布比卡因的躯体与内脏抗伤害感受及神经毒性比较
Anesthesiology. 2006 Jun;104(6):1249-56. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200606000-00021.
10
A comparative study of the safety and efficacy of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for epidural anesthesia in subjects undergoing elective caesarean section.0.5%左旋布比卡因与0.5%布比卡因用于择期剖宫产硬膜外麻醉的安全性和有效性比较研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2002 Mar;40(1):13-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Updates on Wound Infiltration Use for Postoperative Pain Management: A Narrative Review.伤口浸润用于术后疼痛管理的最新进展:一项叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 11;10(20):4659. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204659.
2
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Levobupivacaine.左旋布比卡因的临床药代动力学与药效学
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Jun;59(6):715-745. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00868-0.
3
A review and new insights to antimicrobial action of local anesthetics.局部麻醉药的抗菌作用:综述及新见解。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;38(6):991-1002. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-03460-4. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
4
The efficiency of topical anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: A review of use in dentistry.局部麻醉剂作为抗菌剂的有效性:牙科应用综述。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;18(4):223-233. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.4.223. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
Pain alleviation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery; presternal local anesthetic and magnesium infiltration versus conventional intravenous analgesia: a randomized double-blind study.心脏手术患者的疼痛缓解:胸骨前局部麻醉和镁浸润与传统静脉镇痛的比较:一项随机双盲研究。
Korean J Pain. 2018 Apr;31(2):93-101. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2018.31.2.93. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
6
The analgesic efficacy of continuous presternal bupivacaine infusion through a single catheter after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后经单根导管持续胸骨前输注布比卡因的镇痛效果。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2015 Jan-Mar;18(1):15-20. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.148314.