Cheng Ching-Rong, Su Tsung-Hsien, Hung Yu-Chun, Wang Pu-Tsui
Department of Anesthesiology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, #92, Sec. 2, Chung-Shan N. Road, Taipei, Taiwan 104, ROC.
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2002 Mar;40(1):13-20.
Levobupivacaine is the S(-)-enantiomer of the racemic bupivacaine. Data of pharmacological studies suggest that levobupivacaine has a lower potential of toxicity for central nervous and cardiovascular systems than does bupivacaine. The present study was undertaken to compare the safety and efficacy between levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in epidural anesthesia for Cesarean delivery.
A prospective, controlled, double-blinded study was conducted in 45 ASA class I-II Taiwanese obstetric patients undergoing elective Caesarean Section under extradural anesthesia. Patients were randomized to receive either 25 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine or 0.5% levobupivacaine in a double-blinded fashion. The end points of measurements relevant to efficacy included onset, fade-out, and quality of anesthesia. The safety end-point measurements included Apgar scores, maternal ECG, maternal and neonatal blood pH, and adverse events.
There was no significant difference between groups in the profile of sensory and motor blockade produced. Comparison of visual analogue pain scores did not show significant differences between groups at the corresponding times. There were no significant differences between groups in muscle relaxation scores assessed by obstetricians as well as the overall assessment of block quality rated by anesthesiologists. Apgar scores, maternal and neonatal blood pH, maternal ECG, and adverse events did not differ between groups. The drug-related adverse events were hypotension and shivering which were equally seen in levobupivacaine and bupivacaine groups. There was no other serious adverse event that happened in both groups.
The onset and fade-out of sensory and motor blockade, quality of anesthesia, muscle relaxation and overall quality of anesthesia as assessed were comparable between two groups. No significant maternal or neonatal adverse events were found between the treatment groups. In comparison, levobupivacaine had the efficacy and safety profile equivalent to bupivacaine in epidural anesthesia for Caesarean section.
左旋布比卡因是消旋布比卡因的S(-)-对映体。药理学研究数据表明,左旋布比卡因对中枢神经系统和心血管系统的毒性潜力低于布比卡因。本研究旨在比较左旋布比卡因和布比卡因在剖宫产硬膜外麻醉中的安全性和有效性。
对45例ASA I-II级择期剖宫产硬膜外麻醉的台湾产科患者进行前瞻性、对照、双盲研究。患者以双盲方式随机接受25ml 0.5%布比卡因或0.5%左旋布比卡因。与疗效相关的测量终点包括起效时间、消退时间和麻醉质量。安全性终点测量包括阿氏评分、产妇心电图、产妇和新生儿血液pH值以及不良事件。
两组产生的感觉和运动阻滞情况无显著差异。视觉模拟疼痛评分比较在相应时间两组间无显著差异。产科医生评估的肌肉松弛评分以及麻醉医生评定的阻滞质量总体评估在两组间无显著差异。两组间阿氏评分、产妇和新生儿血液pH值、产妇心电图及不良事件无差异。与药物相关的不良事件为低血压和寒战,在左旋布比卡因组和布比卡因组中出现情况相同。两组均未发生其他严重不良事件。
两组间感觉和运动阻滞的起效和消退、麻醉质量、肌肉松弛及总体麻醉质量相当。治疗组间未发现显著的产妇或新生儿不良事件。相比之下,左旋布比卡因在剖宫产硬膜外麻醉中的有效性和安全性与布比卡因相当。