Wang J F
School of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
Holist Nurs Pract. 1999 Apr;13(3):44-52. doi: 10.1097/00004650-199904000-00008.
The article describes data collected using Pollock's Health-Related Hardiness Scale (HRHS) in two cultural groups of nurses. The purposes of the study were to verify the workability of the HRHS cross-culturally and to compare the effects of health hardiness in nurses in the United States and Taiwan. A total of 163 American and 615 Taiwanese nurses participated and answered a self-administered questionnaire by using Pollock's 34-item HRHS. Psychometric analyses identified two factors of hardiness that are different from Pollock's factors. Pollock's findings were verified, and the HRHS is valid for measuring hardiness constructs as exemplified by the strong factor loading obtained from this study, which ranged from 0.43 to 0.68 for American nurses and 0.47 to 0.68 for Taiwanese nurses.
这篇文章描述了使用波洛克健康相关坚韧量表（HRHS）在两组不同文化背景的护士群体中收集的数据。该研究的目的是验证HRHS在跨文化背景下的可行性，并比较美国和台湾护士的健康坚韧度的影响。共有163名美国护士和615名台湾护士参与，并通过使用波洛克的34项HRHS回答了一份自填式问卷。心理测量分析确定了两个与波洛克所提出的因素不同的坚韧因素。波洛克的研究结果得到了验证，并且HRHS对于测量坚韧结构是有效的，本研究获得的强大因素负荷证明了这一点，美国护士的因素负荷范围为0.43至0.68，台湾护士的因素负荷范围为0.47至0.68。
