Suppr超能文献

一项关于头孢曲松与标准疗法治疗下呼吸道感染的随机多中心研究。

A randomised, multicentre study of ceftriaxone versus standard therapy in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

作者信息

de Klerk G J, van Steijn J H, Lobatto S, Jaspers C A, van Veldhuizen W C, Hensing C A, Bunnik M C, Geraedts W H, Dofferhof A S, Van Den Berg J, Melis J H, Hoepelman A I

机构信息

Hospital Hilversum, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1999 Jul;12(2):121-7. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(99)00037-0.

Abstract

In this study the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of i.v. ceftriaxone 1 g once daily (CTX) was compared with standard i.v. antibiotic treatment (STD) for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). STD was given according to the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society and consisted of either cefuroxime 1500 mg three times daily (q8h), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1200 mg q8h or ceftriaxone 2 g once daily; each with or without a macrolide. After a minimum of 5 days i.v. therapy, patients could be switched to oral therapy. One hundred patients were enrolled in the study; 52 patients received CTX and 48 STD. Groups were comparable with respect to demographic and baseline characteristics. Seventy patients had a confirmed diagnosis of pneumonia. Twenty-nine patients had a severe type I exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. In one patient the diagnosis of LRTI could not be confirmed. In approximately 50% of the patients a microbiological diagnosis could be made. The most important isolated pathogens from sputum and blood were (positive blood cultures in brackets): Streptococcus pneumoniae 14 (9) and Haemophilus influenzae 16. Mean duration of i.v. therapy was 7.4 days in both groups. Average duration of hospitalisation was 15.0 days for CTX patients and 15.9 days for STD patients. Overall cure and improvement rate at the end of treatment was 47 (90%) for patients receiving ceftriaxone 1 g compared to 37 (77%) for patients receiving standard therapy. Pathogens were eradicated or presumed to be eradicated in 84% of the CTX patients and in 76% of the STD patients. Mean total costs per treatment were lower for CTX than for STD treatment: NLG 169 versus 458. These results show, that i.v. ceftriaxone 1 g once daily is as effective as standard therapy in the treatment of LRTI and that its use reduces treatment costs, in view of the multiple daily dosing regimens of most standard therapies.

摘要

在本研究中,将每日一次静脉注射1克头孢曲松(CTX)与治疗下呼吸道感染(LRTI)的标准静脉抗生素治疗(STD)的疗效和成本效益进行了比较。STD根据美国胸科学会的指南给予,包括每日三次(每8小时一次)1500毫克头孢呋辛、每8小时一次1200毫克阿莫西林/克拉维酸或每日一次2克头孢曲松;每种药物可加或不加大环内酯类药物。在至少5天的静脉治疗后,患者可转为口服治疗。100名患者纳入本研究;52名患者接受CTX治疗,48名患者接受STD治疗。两组在人口统计学和基线特征方面具有可比性。70名患者确诊为肺炎。29名患者患有严重的I型慢性支气管炎加重。1名患者的LRTI诊断无法确诊。约50%的患者可做出微生物学诊断。痰液和血液中最重要的分离病原体为(括号内为血培养阳性):肺炎链球菌14例(9例)和流感嗜血杆菌16例。两组的平均静脉治疗持续时间均为7.4天。CTX组患者的平均住院时间为15.0天,STD组患者为15.9天。接受1克头孢曲松治疗的患者在治疗结束时的总体治愈和改善率为47例(90%),而接受标准治疗的患者为37例(77%)。84%的CTX组患者和76%的STD组患者的病原体被根除或推测被根除。CTX组每次治疗的平均总成本低于STD组:169荷兰盾对458荷兰盾。这些结果表明,鉴于大多数标准疗法的每日多次给药方案,每日一次静脉注射1克头孢曲松在治疗LRTI方面与标准疗法一样有效,且其使用可降低治疗成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验