The effect of reconstitution of an Haemophilus influenzae type b-tentanus toxoid conjugate (PRP-T) vaccine on the immune responses to a diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine: a five-year follow-up.

Controversial results have been obtained from previous studies on the combined administration of Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid conjugate (PRP-T) and diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis (DTwP) combination vaccines, with regard to possible reciprocal interference between the constituent antigens. To document the priming effect and possible long-term immunogenic interference of PRP-T and DTwP combination vaccines, a randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted in Belgium. A total of 168 healthy infants received, at 3, 4 and 5 months of age, DTwP vaccine mixed just prior to injection either with PRP-T vaccine (group A, DTwP//PRP-T, N = 85) or with placebo (group B, DTwP//Placebo, N = 83). At the age of 14 months, children of both groups were randomized to receive either a dose of DTwP//PRP-T vaccine (subgroups A1 and B1) or a dose of Hib polysaccharide (PRP) vaccine (subgroups A2 and B2). Those children in subgroups A1 and B1 had an additional serum sample taken at the age of 5 years (at the time of a DT booster). The immune response to Hib polysaccharide at the age of 4, 5 and 6 months confirmed the excellent immunogenicity profile of PRP-T in infants. In addition, the vigorous anamnestic response (i.e. a 20-fold increase of GMT) to a booster dose of the plain capsular polysaccharide (PRP) reflected the efficient Hib-priming induced by the combined DTwP//PRP-T vaccine. Reconstitution of PRP-T with DTwP did not affect the immune response to diphtheria toxoid or pertussis agglutinins. Nevertheless, at almost any time point during the five-year follow-up, the tetanus antitoxin GMT values were significantly lower in the DTwP//PRP-T group (A and A1) than in the DTwP//Placebo group (B and B1). Despite the suppressive effect on GMT values, intergroup differences in rates of seroprotection were never significant, except after doses 2 and 3 for which there were lower percentages of children in group A with antitoxin titers > 0.05 IU/mL and > 1.0 IU/mL. In the group primed with the combined DTwP//PRP-T vaccine, (1) a DT booster dose at the age of 5 years provoked a 150-fold increase in tetanus antitoxin GMT, (2) a high tetanus antitoxin GMT value was attained (GMT = 19.3 IU/mL) and (3) all children in this group had tetanus antitoxin titers > 1.0 IU/mL, so it may be concluded that all these children will still be protected against tetanus until at least the age of the next recommended booster dose (i.e. the age of 15 years). No differences in the occurrence of adverse events were observed between the groups who received the DTwP//PRP-T vaccine or the DTwP//Placebo vaccine, both vaccines being associated with events customarily attributable to DTwP (data not shown). Our results indicate (1) that the combination vaccine, DTwP//PRP-T, represents a safe and effective alternative for the existing uncombined vaccines and (2) that the long-term effect of interference between the components of future combination vaccines should be studied with subsequent booster doses, followed by the evaluation of persistence of antibodies over several years.