• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良的乔尔-科恩剖宫产技术。

Modified Joel-Cohen technique for caesarean delivery.

作者信息

Wallin G, Fall O

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Mar;106(3):221-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08234.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08234.x
PMID:10426640
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a series of changes in the current caesarean section operative routine, based on new knowledge, would be beneficial.

DESIGN

A prospective controlled trial.

SETTING

Labour ward with approximately 3000 deliveries annually in a suburban area of Gothenburg, Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-two pregnant women scheduled for delivery by caesarean section were randomised to either modified Joel-Cohen technique (n = 36) or Pfannenstiel technique (n = 36).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Blood loss during surgery and operating time.

RESULTS

The median estimated intra-operative blood loss was 250 mL in the modified Joel-Cohen group and 400 mL in the Pfannenstiel group (P = 0.026). The proportion of women with > or = 300 mL was 16/36 in the modified Joel-Cohen group vs 28/36 in the Pfannenstiel group (OR 0.229, 95% CI 0.082-0.637). Median operating time was 20 min in the modified Joel-Cohen group compared with 28 min in the Pfannenstiel group (P < 0.001). The proportion of women with > or = 25 min was 1/36 in the modified Joel-Cohen group vs 33/36 in the Pfannenstiel group (OR 0.003, 95% CI 0.000-0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the modified Joel-Cohen technique of caesarean delivery reduced intraoperative blood loss and operating time compared with the Pfannenstiel technique.

摘要

目的

基于新知识,研究当前剖宫产手术常规操作的一系列改变是否有益。

设计

前瞻性对照试验。

地点

瑞典哥德堡郊区的产科病房,每年约有3000例分娩。

参与者

72例计划行剖宫产的孕妇被随机分为改良乔尔-科恩技术组(n = 36)和耻骨联合上横切口技术组(n = 36)。

主要观察指标

手术中的失血量和手术时间。

结果

改良乔尔-科恩组术中估计失血量中位数为250 mL,耻骨联合上横切口组为400 mL(P = 0.026)。失血量≥300 mL的女性比例在改良乔尔-科恩组为16/36,耻骨联合上横切口组为28/36(比值比0.229,95%可信区间0.082 - 0.637)。改良乔尔-科恩组手术时间中位数为20分钟,耻骨联合上横切口组为28分钟(P < 0.001)。手术时间≥25分钟的女性比例在改良乔尔-科恩组为1/36,耻骨联合上横切口组为33/36(比值比0.003,95%可信区间0.000 - 0.026)。

结论

我们得出结论,与耻骨联合上横切口技术相比,改良乔尔-科恩剖宫产技术减少了术中失血量和手术时间。

相似文献

1
Modified Joel-Cohen technique for caesarean delivery.改良的乔尔-科恩剖宫产技术。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Mar;106(3):221-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08234.x.
2
Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery: does it make a difference?剖宫产时采用乔尔-科恩切口或耻骨联合上横切口:有区别吗?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Nov;81(11):1040-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.811108.x.
3
Review of advantages of Joel-Cohen surgical abdominal incision in caesarean section: a basic science perspective.从基础科学角度审视乔尔-科恩式腹部手术切口在剖宫产中的优势
Med J Malaysia. 2010 Sep;65(3):204-8.
4
Caesarean deliveries by Pfannenstiel versus Joel-Cohen incision: A randomised controlled trial.耻骨联合上横切口与乔尔-科恩切口剖宫产术:一项随机对照试验。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013 Dec 1;14(4):194-200. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.75725. eCollection 2013.
5
Maternal infection rates after cesarean delivery by Pfannenstiel or Joel-Cohen incision: a multicenter surveillance study.剖宫产术后经 Pfannenstiel 或 Joel-Cohen 切口的产妇感染率:一项多中心监测研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Dec;147(2):139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
6
A randomized comparative study on modified Joel-Cohen incision versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section.改良Joel-Cohen切口与Pfannenstiel切口用于剖宫产的随机对照研究。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013 Mar 1;14(1):28-34. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.07. eCollection 2013.
7
Comparison of the Joel-Cohen-based technique and the transverse Pfannenstiel for caesarean section for safety and effectiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于乔尔-科恩技术与横切口Pfannenstiel切口剖宫产安全性和有效性的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Sep 4;31:54. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.54. eCollection 2017.
8
Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section.剖宫产的腹部手术切口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD004453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004453.pub2.
9
Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section.剖宫产的腹部手术切口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD004453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004453.pub3.
10
Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in cesarean section.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994 Feb;53(2):121-2. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90218-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?被动第二产程的持续时间是否与剖宫产术中子宫切口延长的风险相关?
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 1;16(10):e0258049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258049. eCollection 2021.
2
Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.剖宫产术中腹膜关闭与不关闭的短期和长期结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 11;2014(8):CD000163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000163.pub2.
3
Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.
剖宫产时子宫切口及子宫缝合的手术技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 22;2014(7):CD004732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004732.pub3.
4
Caesarean deliveries by Pfannenstiel versus Joel-Cohen incision: A randomised controlled trial.耻骨联合上横切口与乔尔-科恩切口剖宫产术:一项随机对照试验。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013 Dec 1;14(4):194-200. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.75725. eCollection 2013.
5
Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section.剖宫产的腹部手术切口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD004453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004453.pub3.
6
Techniques for caesarean section.剖宫产技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD004662. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004662.pub2.
7
Study on modification of the Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section.剖宫产米斯加夫·拉达赫法改良研究。
J Tongji Med Univ. 2001;21(1):75-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02888044.