• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产米斯加夫·拉达赫法改良研究。

Study on modification of the Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section.

作者信息

Li M, Zou L, Zhu J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiehe Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022.

出版信息

J Tongji Med Univ. 2001;21(1):75-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02888044.

DOI:10.1007/BF02888044
PMID:11523256
Abstract

172 cases of pregnant women scheduled for delivery by cesarean section were randomly assigned to 59 cases in modification group with modified Misgav Ladach technique, 57 cases in Misgav Ladach group with Misgav Ladach technique and 56 cases in Pfannenstiel group with Pfannenstiel technique from May to Dec. 1999. The modified points included: transversely incising the fascia 2 to 3 cm, then dividing it bluntly; without opening and dissociating the visceral peritoneum; two layers suturing of low transverse uterine incision; closing the skin by continuous suturing. Results showed the average delivery time in the modification group was (3.6 +/- 2.6) min and (5.7 +/- 2.9) min in the Misgav Ladach group (P < 0.05). Median operating time was (28.3 +/- 5.4) min in modification group compared with (27.5 +/- 6.5) min in the Misgav Ladach group (P > 0.05). Average blood loss was (128 +/- 35) ml in modification group compared with (212 +/- 147) ml in the Pfannenstiel group (P < 0.05). It was concluded that the modified Misgav Ladach technique not only preserved all advantages of Misgav Ladach method, but also had additional advantages, such as faster in delivering the fetus, less damage, easier mastering for obstetricians.

摘要

1999年5月至12月,将172例行剖宫产术的孕妇随机分为改良组59例,采用改良的米氏剖宫产术;米氏组57例,采用米氏剖宫产术;Pfannenstiel组56例,采用Pfannenstiel术式。改良要点包括:横行切开筋膜2~3cm,然后钝性分离;不打开和游离脏腹膜;子宫下段横切口两层缝合;连续缝合关闭皮肤。结果显示,改良组平均娩出时间为(3.6±2.6)分钟,米氏组为(5.7±2.9)分钟(P<0.05)。改良组中位手术时间为(28.3±5.4)分钟,米氏组为(27.5±6.5)分钟(P>0.05)。改良组平均出血量为(128±35)ml,Pfannenstiel组为(212±147)ml(P<0.05)。结论:改良的米氏剖宫产术不仅保留了米氏剖宫产术的所有优点,还具有娩出胎儿更快、损伤更小、产科医生更容易掌握等优点。

相似文献

1
Study on modification of the Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section.剖宫产米斯加夫·拉达赫法改良研究。
J Tongji Med Univ. 2001;21(1):75-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02888044.
2
The Misgav Ladach method--a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics.米斯加夫·拉达赫法——产科手术技术的一大进步。
J Perinat Med. 2003;31(5):395-8. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2003.061.
3
[The Misgav-Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel technique].[剖宫产的米斯加夫-拉达赫法与耻骨上横切口剖宫产术的比较]
Ginekol Pol. 2002 Aug;73(8):672-6.
4
Modified Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: clinical experience.改良米斯加夫-拉达赫剖宫产术:临床经验
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;65(4):222-6. doi: 10.1159/000113044. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
5
[Cesarean section by the Misgav Ladach+ with the abdominal opening surgery by the Joel Cohen method].[采用米斯加夫·拉达赫法剖宫产术及乔尔·科恩法腹部开口手术]
Ginekol Pol. 2000 Apr;71(4):284-7.
6
[Comparison of pregnancy outcomes Caesarean techniques: modified Misgav-Ladach, Pfannenstiel-Kerr and Kerr-half infraumbilical].剖宫产技术的妊娠结局比较:改良米斯加夫-拉达赫法、耻骨联合上横切口法和克尔半脐下切口法
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2016 Aug;84(8):514-22.
7
Short-term postnatal quality of life in women with previous Misgav Ladach caesarean section compared to Pfannenstiel-Dorffler caesarean section method.与Pfannenstiel-Dorffler剖宫产术相比,曾采用Misgav Ladach剖宫产术的女性产后短期生活质量。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Sep;24(9):1138-42. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.545919. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
8
Comparative study of the ''Misgav Ladach'' and traditional Pfannenstiel surgical techniques for cesarean section.剖宫产“米斯加夫·拉达赫”手术与传统耻骨联合上横切口手术技术的对比研究
Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Jun;59(3):231-40.
9
The Misgav-Ladach method of cesarean section: a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics.米氏剖宫产术:产科手术技术的进步。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Nov;286(5):1141-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2448-6. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
10
The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel method.剖宫产的米斯加夫·拉达赫法与耻骨联合上横切口剖宫产术的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 Jan;78(1):37-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Added value of surgical interdisciplinarity- The Joel-Cohen's abdominal incision.手术跨学科的附加值——乔尔-科恩腹部切口
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jun 1;67:102455. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102455. eCollection 2021 Jul.
2
Techniques for caesarean section.剖宫产技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD004662. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004662.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Modified Joel-Cohen technique for caesarean delivery.改良的乔尔-科恩剖宫产技术。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Mar;106(3):221-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08234.x.
2
The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description.米斯加夫·拉达赫剖宫产术:方法描述。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 Aug;78(7):615-21.
3
Cesarean section using the Misgav Ladach method.采用米斯加夫·拉达赫法进行剖宫产。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997 Jun;57(3):273-9. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(97)00069-6.
4
Nonfatal venous air embolism during cesarean section: a case report and review of the literature.剖宫产术中非致死性静脉空气栓塞:一例病例报告及文献复习
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994 Jan;49(1):72-6. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199401000-00028.
5
Extraabdominal uterine exteriorization at cesarean section.剖宫产术中子宫腹壁外牵出术
Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Aug;52(2):189-92.