Suppr超能文献

在非共同性斜视评估中,遮盖前后的兰卡斯特红绿试验。

The Lancaster red-green test before and after occlusion in the evaluation of incomitant strabismus.

作者信息

Hwang J M, Guyton D L

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Adult Strabismus, Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J AAPOS. 1999 Jun;3(3):151-6. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(99)70060-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with incomitant strabismus can often fuse in a limited area of gaze. Prolongation of neurologically learned fusional vergence tone ("vergence adaptation") in and near this area can result in misleading measurements with standard clinical measures of strabismus. Monocular occlusion for at least 30 minutes eliminates most of the effect of vergence adaptation. The Lancaster red-green test provides an elegant and convenient map of incomitant strabismus. We investigated the efficacy of the Lancaster red-green test before and after monocular occlusion for the investigation of incomitant strabismus.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the results of the Lancaster red-green test in 6 patients with incomitant vertical strabismus in whom we suspected that vergence adaptation might be distorting the pattern of deviation. The test was performed before and after monocular occlusion for 30 to 60 minutes, and the preocclusion and postocclusion results were compared.

RESULTS

In the 6 cases studied, the Lancaster red-green test showed at least a 5-PD increase in the hyperdeviation, after monocular occlusion. The increases were mostly in primary gaze and downgaze, which tended to regularize the pattern of deviation.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of monocular occlusion and the Lancaster red-green test is useful for uncovering the effect of vergence adaptation. Such results may often simplify the planning of surgical correction because the incomitance usually decreases after monocular occlusion, making it less likely that surgery will worsen the alignment in the area previously fused. We recommend that monocular occlusion should be considered when planning surgery or even prism correction for incomitant deviations, especially when the initial Lancaster red-green test shows an unexpected incomitant pattern where there is fusion in 1 direction of gaze but not in others.

摘要

背景

非共同性斜视患者通常可在有限的注视区域内融合。在此区域及附近,神经学上习得的融合性聚散张力(“聚散适应”)的延长会导致斜视标准临床测量出现误导性结果。单眼遮挡至少30分钟可消除大部分聚散适应的影响。兰开斯特红绿试验提供了一种简洁且方便的非共同性斜视图谱。我们研究了单眼遮挡前后兰开斯特红绿试验在非共同性斜视检查中的效果。

方法

我们回顾性研究了6例非共同性垂直斜视患者的兰开斯特红绿试验结果,我们怀疑聚散适应可能会扭曲斜视模式。在单眼遮挡30至60分钟前后进行该试验,并比较遮挡前和遮挡后的结果。

结果

在所研究的6例病例中,单眼遮挡后,兰开斯特红绿试验显示上斜视至少增加了5棱镜度。增加主要出现在第一眼位和下转位,这倾向于使斜视模式变得规则。

结论

单眼遮挡与兰开斯特红绿试验相结合有助于揭示聚散适应的影响。这样的结果通常可简化手术矫正计划,因为单眼遮挡后非共同性通常会降低,使得手术不太可能恶化先前融合区域的眼位矫正。我们建议,在计划对非共同性斜视进行手术甚至棱镜矫正时,应考虑单眼遮挡,尤其是当最初的兰开斯特红绿试验显示出意外的非共同性模式,即仅在一个注视方向存在融合而其他方向不存在融合时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验