Suppr超能文献

开发一种简单的计算机化扭转试验以量化主观眼扭转。

Development of a simple computerized torsion test to quantify subjective ocular torsion.

作者信息

Kim Y D, Yang H K, Hwang J-M

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2017 Nov;31(11):1562-1568. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.90. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

Abstract

PurposeThe double Maddox-rod test (DMRT) and Lancaster red-green test (LRGT) are the most widely used tests worldwide to assess subjective ocular torsion. However, these tests require equipment and the quantified results of ocular torsion are only provided in rough values. Here we developed a novel computerized torsion test (CTT) for individual assessment of subjective ocular torsion and validated the reliability and accuracy of the test compared with those of the DMRT and LRGT.MethodsA total of 30 patients with cyclovertical strabismus and 30 controls were recruited. The CTT was designed using Microsoft Office PowerPoint. Subjects wore red-green filter spectacles and viewed gradually tilted red and cyan lines on an LCD monitor and pressed the keyboard to go through the slides, until both lines seemed parallel. All subjects underwent the CTT, DMRT, and LRGT. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were analyzed to assess the acceptability of the CTT compared with that of the DMRT.ResultsBoth the DMRT and CTT showed no significant test-retest differences in the strabismus and control groups. The DMRT and CTT results demonstrated an acceptable agreement. The reliability of the CTT was better than that of the DMRT. The LRGT showed low sensitivity for the detection of ocular torsion compared with the DMRT (40.0%) and CTT (39.1%).ConclusionOur results suggest that the assessment of subjective ocular torsion using the CTT based on PowerPoint software is simple, reproducible, and accurate and can be applied in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

双马多克斯杆试验(DMRT)和兰开斯特红绿试验(LRGT)是全球范围内用于评估主观眼扭转最广泛使用的试验。然而,这些试验需要设备,并且眼扭转的量化结果仅以粗略值提供。在此,我们开发了一种用于个体主观眼扭转评估的新型计算机化扭转试验(CTT),并与DMRT和LRGT相比验证了该试验的可靠性和准确性。

方法

共招募了30例垂直旋转斜视患者和30例对照者。CTT使用Microsoft Office PowerPoint设计。受试者佩戴红绿滤光眼镜,在液晶显示器上观看逐渐倾斜的红色和青色线条,并按键盘浏览幻灯片,直到两条线看起来平行。所有受试者均接受CTT、DMRT和LRGT。分析组内相关系数和Bland-Altman图以评估CTT与DMRT相比的可接受性。

结果

DMRT和CTT在斜视组和对照组中均未显示出显著的重测差异。DMRT和CTT结果显示出可接受的一致性。CTT的可靠性优于DMRT。与DMRT(40.0%)和CTT(39.1%)相比,LRGT对眼扭转检测的敏感性较低。

结论

我们的结果表明,基于PowerPoint软件的CTT用于主观眼扭转评估简单、可重复且准确,可应用于临床实践。

相似文献

3
Observations about objective and subjective ocular torsion.关于客观和主观眼扭转的观察。
Ophthalmology. 2009 Oct;116(10):2001-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.047. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical utility and assessment of cyclodeviation.临床应用与评估的眼外肌麻痹
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;24(6):558-65. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000003.
5
Clinical characteristics of cyclodeviation.旋转斜视的临床特征
Eye (Lond). 2005 Aug;19(8):873-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701675.
7
A new test for the measurement of torsion.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1996 Jan-Feb;33(1):63-4. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19960101-16.
8
Cyclotorsion in unilateral and bilateral superior oblique paresis.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1993 Nov-Dec;30(6):361-7. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19931101-05.
9
Cyclodeviation in acquired vertical strabismus.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 May;102(5):717-20. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030573021.
10
The Bagolini striated lens test for cyclotropia.
Doc Ophthalmol. 1984 Aug 15;58(1):131-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00140911.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验