• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家族性前列腺癌的年龄特异性风险:高危人群筛查建议的依据。

Age specific risks of familial prostate carcinoma: a basis for screening recommendations in high risk populations.

作者信息

Grönberg H, Wiklund F, Damber J E

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Umeå University, Sweden.

出版信息

Cancer. 1999 Aug 1;86(3):477-83.

PMID:10430256
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A positive family history is one of the strongest known risk factors for prostate carcinoma in addition to age and race. In this article, the authors present age specific risks for developing prostate carcinoma in families with an aggregation of prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

Data from a population-based cohort study including 5706 sons of Swedish men who had been diagnosed with prostate carcinoma between 1959 and 1963 were used. The age specific incidence rates were calculated for different cohorts of prostate carcinoma families with respect to patient age at the time of prostate carcinoma diagnosis and the number of men affected.

RESULTS

Both patient age at the time of prostate carcinoma diagnosis and the number of men affected in the families influenced the risk of developing prostate carcinoma significantly. Unaffected men in families with two or more cases of prostate carcinoma have a very high risk of developing prostate carcinoma at a young age. The cumulative risks in these families are 5%, 15%, and 30% by ages 60 years, 70 years, and 80 years, respectively, compared with only 0.45%, 3%, and 10%, respectively, at the same ages in the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the current study together with data from the literature support the case for the screening of high risk families. The authors also conclude that men with at least two close relatives with prostate carcinoma have a very high risk of developing prostate carcinoma before age 70 years. The authors recommend these men undergo testing for prostate specific antigen and a digital rectal examination annually between the ages 50 years 70 years, ages at which patients usually are offered curative treatment for localized tumors. Screening of individuals before age 50 years may be recommended in selected families with a history of prostate carcinoma of very early onset.

摘要

背景

除年龄和种族外,家族史是已知的前列腺癌最强风险因素之一。在本文中,作者呈现了前列腺癌聚集家族中前列腺癌发病的年龄特异性风险。

方法

使用了一项基于人群的队列研究数据,该研究纳入了1959年至1963年间被诊断为前列腺癌的瑞典男性的5706名儿子。针对不同队列的前列腺癌家族,根据前列腺癌诊断时的患者年龄和受影响男性的数量计算年龄特异性发病率。

结果

前列腺癌诊断时的患者年龄以及家族中受影响男性的数量均显著影响前列腺癌发病风险。在有两例或更多例前列腺癌的家族中,未受影响的男性在年轻时患前列腺癌的风险非常高。这些家族在60岁、70岁和80岁时的累积风险分别为5%、15%和30%,而在普通人群中同一年龄段的累积风险分别仅为0.45%、3%和10%。

结论

当前研究结果与文献数据均支持对高危家族进行筛查。作者还得出结论,至少有两个近亲患前列腺癌的男性在70岁前患前列腺癌的风险非常高。作者建议这些男性在50岁至70岁之间每年进行前列腺特异性抗原检测和直肠指检,这一年龄段的患者通常可接受针对局限性肿瘤的根治性治疗。对于有前列腺癌极早发病家族史的特定家族,可能建议在50岁之前对个体进行筛查。

相似文献

1
Age specific risks of familial prostate carcinoma: a basis for screening recommendations in high risk populations.家族性前列腺癌的年龄特异性风险:高危人群筛查建议的依据。
Cancer. 1999 Aug 1;86(3):477-83.
2
Age specific and attributable risks of familial prostate carcinoma from the family-cancer database.来自家庭癌症数据库的家族性前列腺癌的年龄特异性和归因风险。
Cancer. 2002 Sep 15;95(6):1346-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10819.
3
Prostate carcinoma detection and increased prostate-specific antigen levels after 4 years in Dutch and Japanese males who had no evidence of disease at initial screening.在初次筛查时无疾病证据的荷兰和日本男性中,4年后前列腺癌的检测及前列腺特异性抗原水平升高。
Cancer. 2005 Jan 15;103(2):242-50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20739.
4
Familial prostate cancer in Sweden. A nationwide register cohort study.瑞典的家族性前列腺癌。一项全国性登记队列研究。
Cancer. 1996 Jan 1;77(1):138-43. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<138::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO;2-5.
5
Age at diagnosis and age at death in familial prostate cancer.家族性前列腺癌的诊断年龄与死亡年龄。
Oncologist. 2009 Dec;14(12):1209-17. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0132. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
6
Hereditary aspects of prostate cancer.前列腺癌的遗传因素
CMAJ. 1995 Oct 1;153(7):895-900.
7
Prostate carcinoma among men with human immunodeficiency virus infection.感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的男性中的前列腺癌
Cancer. 2004 Jul 15;101(2):294-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20389.
8
Empiric risk of prostate carcinoma for relatives of patients with prostate carcinoma: a meta-analysis.前列腺癌患者亲属患前列腺癌的经验性风险:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer. 2003 Apr 15;97(8):1894-903. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11262.
9
Decreasing age at prostate cancer diagnosis over successive generations in prostate cancer families.前列腺癌家族中连续几代人前列腺癌诊断年龄的降低。
Prostate. 2005 Jun 15;64(1):60-6. doi: 10.1002/pros.20220.
10
Potentially advanced malignancies detected by screening for prostate carcinoma after an interval of 4 years.在4年的间隔期后通过前列腺癌筛查检测出的潜在晚期恶性肿瘤。
Cancer. 2004 Mar 1;100(5):968-75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20048.

引用本文的文献

1
An epidemiological reappraisal of the familial aggregation of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.前列腺癌家族聚集的流行病学再评价:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e27130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027130. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
2
Common 8q24 sequence variations are associated with Asian Indian advanced prostate cancer risk.常见的8q24序列变异与亚洲印度裔晚期前列腺癌风险相关。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Sep;17(9):2431-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2823.
3
Phorate exposure and incidence of cancer in the agricultural health study.
农业健康研究中伏杀硫磷暴露与癌症发病率
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Aug;114(8):1205-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8911.
4
Vietnam military service history and prostate cancer.越南兵役史与前列腺癌。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Mar 24;6:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-75.
5
Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.遗传性癌症风险评估与咨询:美国国家遗传咨询师协会的建议
J Genet Couns. 2004 Apr;13(2):83-114. doi: 10.1023/B:JOGC.0000018821.48330.77.
6
New insights and candidate genes and their implications for care of patients with hereditary prostate cancer.关于遗传性前列腺癌患者护理的新见解、候选基因及其意义。
Curr Urol Rep. 2000 May;1(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s11934-000-0029-x.