Feng L, Wang C Y, Jiang H, Oho C, Dugich-Djordjevic M, Mei L, Lu B
Unit on Synapse Development and Plasticity, Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, NICHD, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4480, USA.
Neuroscience. 1999;93(1):265-73. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(99)00129-3.
In the ventral mesencephalon, two neurotrophic factors, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, have been shown previously to have similar effects on the survival of dopaminergic neurons. Here, we compared the signaling mechanisms for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, focusing on the mitogen-associated protein kinase and the transcription factor cyclic-AMP responsive element-binding protein. Double-staining experiments indicated that many neurons co-expressed the receptors for glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor, c-RET and TrkB, suggesting that they are responsive to both brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. Although both brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor induced a rapid phosphorylation of mitogen-associated protein kinase and cyclic-AMP, responsive element-binding protein, there were significant differences in the kinetics and pharmacology of the phosphorylation. The phosphorylation of mitogen-associated protein kinase by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor was transient; within 2 h, the level of mitogen-associated protein kinase phosphorylation returned to baseline. In contrast, the effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor was long lasting; the mitogen-associated protein kinase remained phosphorylated for up to 4 h after brain-derived neurotrophic factor treatment. PD098059, a specific inhibitor for mitogen-associated protein kinase kinase, completely blocked the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor signaling through mitogen-associated protein kinase, but had no effect on brain-derived neurotrophic factor-induced mitogen-associated protein kinase phosphorylation. Both brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor induced the phosphorylation of cyclic-AMP responsive element-binding protein in the nuclei of ventral mesencephalon neurons. However, PD098059 blocked the cyclic-AMP responsive element-binding protein phosphorylation induced by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, but not that by brain-derived neurotrophic factor. These results indicate that, although both brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor act on ventral mesencephalon neurons, the two factors have different signaling mechanisms, which may mediate their distinctive biological functions.
在腹侧中脑,先前已表明两种神经营养因子,即脑源性神经营养因子和胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子,对多巴胺能神经元的存活具有相似的作用。在此,我们比较了脑源性神经营养因子和胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子的信号传导机制,重点关注丝裂原活化蛋白激酶和转录因子环磷腺苷反应元件结合蛋白。双重染色实验表明,许多神经元共表达胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子和脑源性神经营养因子的受体,即c-RET和TrkB,这表明它们对脑源性神经营养因子和胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子均有反应。虽然脑源性神经营养因子和胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子均诱导丝裂原活化蛋白激酶和环磷腺苷反应元件结合蛋白的快速磷酸化,但在磷酸化的动力学和药理学方面存在显著差异。胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子诱导的丝裂原活化蛋白激酶磷酸化是短暂的;在2小时内,丝裂原活化蛋白激酶磷酸化水平恢复到基线。相反,脑源性神经营养因子的作用是持久的;在脑源性神经营养因子处理后,丝裂原活化蛋白激酶可持续磷酸化长达4小时。PD098059,一种丝裂原活化蛋白激酶激酶的特异性抑制剂,完全阻断了胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子通过丝裂原活化蛋白激酶的信号传导,但对脑源性神经营养因子诱导的丝裂原活化蛋白激酶磷酸化没有影响。脑源性神经营养因子和胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子均诱导腹侧中脑神经元细胞核中环磷腺苷反应元件结合蛋白的磷酸化。然而,PD098059阻断了胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子诱导的环磷腺苷反应元件结合蛋白磷酸化,但未阻断脑源性神经营养因子诱导的该蛋白磷酸化。这些结果表明,虽然脑源性神经营养因子和胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子均作用于腹侧中脑神经元,但这两种因子具有不同的信号传导机制,这可能介导它们独特的生物学功能。