[Dosimetric characterization of a multileaf collimator].

INTRODUCTION

We studied the dosimetric characteristics of a multileaf collimator (MLC) installed on a dual energy accelerator with 6 and 18 MV photon beams in the Radiotherapy Department of Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital in Turin initiating its use in clinical practice. In particular, measurements included transmission through and between the leaves and at the junction under closed-leaves, central axis percentage depth dose, output factors and effective penumbra.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The MLC installed on the dual energy (6 and 18 MV) linear accelerator Varian Clinac 2100 C/D used in our radiotherapy department is an add-on component positioned below the standard jaws; it consists of 40 computer-controlled opposed pairs of 5 cm thick tungsten leaves, each projecting a 1 cm width at the isocenter, and it provides a maximum treatment field of 40 x 40 cm2 at 100 cm SAD. Transmission, penumbra and scalloping values were measured with the standard radiographic film routinary used in our department. A laser scanning photodensitometer (WP102, Wellhofer) with a 450 microns spot was used to obtain the optical density and the relative dose profile. Radiographic films had been calibrated with an ionization chamber, by irradiating samples to known doses; this calibration was used to correct the film scanner readings to dose. Percentage depth doses were also measured in an automatic water phantom (WP600, Wellhofer) for irregular fields defined by either MLC or alloy blocks, in order to test the differences in the build-up region due to the presence of the acrylic accessory tray. Measured and calculated output factors were compared for some irregular fields defined by the MLC. This comparison tested the algorithm accuracy of our Treatment Planning System 3D CadPlan 3.1.1 Varian-Dosetek.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

For both energies, approximately 2% of the incident radiation on the MLC is transmitted and an additional 0.5% leakage occurs between adjacent leaves. The leakage under closed-leaves junction is remarkable: about 25-33%. Relative depth dose curves are similar for two fields shaped by either MLC or conventional jaws. Skin dose with MLC-shaped field is less (3.5%) than the one with cerrobend block-shaped fields. The monitor unit calculation procedure used in our treatment planning system can be applied to the MLC (the difference is less than 1%). Effective penumbra in MLC-shaped irregular fields is on the average 11 mm, which is slightly wider (2-3 mm) than the conventional cerrobend blocks penumbra. Effective penumbra increases with depth, field width and leaves positioning.

CONCLUSIONS

The MLC, if properly used (collimator rotation, jaws and leaves position, high number of fields), can be applied to conformal radiotherapy with good results. The MLC is better than conventional cerrobend blocks both to improve the treatment reproducibility and accuracy, and relative to dosimetric characteristics like dose transmission and skin dose. The use of MLC to modulate beam fluence (IMRT) will permit to modify beam intensity for improved shaping of the treated volume and to overcome the static therapy dosimetric limitations.