• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硫喷妥钠/琥珀胆碱、丙泊酚/阿芬太尼或单独使用氟烷对1-3岁儿童的诱导特征。

Induction characteristics of thiopentone/suxamethonium, propofol/alfentanil or halothane alone in children aged 1-3 years.

作者信息

Annila P, Viitanen H, Reinikainen P, Baer G, Lindgren L

机构信息

Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999 Jun;16(6):359-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00484.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00484.x
PMID:10434162
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of three different induction techniques, with or without neuromuscular block, on tracheal intubation, haemodynamic responses and cardiac rhythm. Ninety children, aged 1-3 years, undergoing day-case adenoidectomy were randomly allocated to three groups: group TS received thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 and suxamethonium 1.5 mg kg-1, group H 5 Vol.% halothane and group PA alfentanil 10 micrograms kg-1 and propofol 3 mg kg-1 for induction of anaesthesia. No anti-cholinergics were used. Holter-monitoring of the heart rate and rhythm was started at least 15 min before induction of anaesthesia and continued until 3 min after intubation. Tracheal intubation was performed by an anaesthetist blinded to the induction method and judged as excellent, moderate or poor according to ease of laryngoscopy, position of vocal cords and incidence of coughing after intubation. Tracheal intubation was successful at the first attempt in all children in groups TS and H and but only in 80% in group PA (P = 0.001). Intubating conditions were excellent in 22 (73%), 22 (73%) and one (3%) of the patients in groups TS, H and PA, respectively (P = 0.001). Cardiac dysrhythmias (supraventricular extrasystole or junctional rhythm) occurred in two (7%) patients in groups PA and H each (NS). Bradycardia occurred in 0 (0%), four (14%) and six (21%) children in groups TS, H and PA, respectively (P = 0.007 PA vs. TS, P = 0.03 H vs. TS). In conclusion, induction of anaesthesia with propofol 3 mg kg-1 and alfentanil 10 micrograms kg-1 without neuromuscular block did not provide acceptable intubating conditions in children 1-3 years, although it preserved arterial pressure better than thiopentone/suxamethonium or halothane. Cardiac dysrhythmias were few regardless of the induction method.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较三种不同诱导技术(有无神经肌肉阻滞)对气管插管、血流动力学反应和心律的影响。90名年龄在1至3岁接受日间腺样体切除术的儿童被随机分为三组:TS组接受硫喷妥钠5mg/kg和琥珀胆碱1.5mg/kg;H组接受5%体积分数的氟烷;PA组接受阿芬太尼10μg/kg和丙泊酚3mg/kg用于麻醉诱导。未使用抗胆碱能药物。在麻醉诱导前至少15分钟开始进行动态心电图监测心率和心律,并持续至插管后3分钟。气管插管由对诱导方法不知情的麻醉医生进行,根据喉镜检查的难易程度、声带位置和插管后咳嗽发生率判断为优、中或差。TS组和H组所有儿童首次气管插管均成功,而PA组仅80%成功(P = 0.001)。TS组、H组和PA组分别有22例(73%)、22例(73%)和1例(3%)患者的插管条件为优(P = 0.001)。PA组和H组各有2例(7%)患者发生心律失常(室上性早搏或交界性心律)(无显著性差异)。TS组无一例(0%)、H组4例(14%)、PA组6例(21%)儿童发生心动过缓(PA组与TS组比较,P = 0.007;H组与TS组比较,P = 0.03)。总之,对于1至3岁儿童,3mg/kg丙泊酚和10μg/kg阿芬太尼在无神经肌肉阻滞情况下进行麻醉诱导,虽比硫喷妥钠/琥珀胆碱或氟烷能更好地维持动脉压,但不能提供可接受的插管条件。无论采用何种诱导方法,心律失常均较少见。

相似文献

1
Induction characteristics of thiopentone/suxamethonium, propofol/alfentanil or halothane alone in children aged 1-3 years.硫喷妥钠/琥珀胆碱、丙泊酚/阿芬太尼或单独使用氟烷对1-3岁儿童的诱导特征。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999 Jun;16(6):359-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00484.x.
2
Alfentanil for intubation under halothane anaesthesia in children.氟烷麻醉下小儿插管使用阿芬太尼
Paediatr Anaesth. 1999;9(6):491-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.1999.00420.x.
3
Recovery after halothane anaesthesia induced with thiopental, propofol-alfentanil or halothane for day-case adenoidectomy in small children.
Br J Anaesth. 1998 Dec;81(6):960-2. doi: 10.1093/bja/81.6.960.
4
Intubating conditions provided by propofol and alfentanil--acceptable, but not ideal.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Sep;41(8):985-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04824.x.
5
Assessment of tracheal intubating conditions in children using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxant.在不使用肌肉松弛剂的情况下,使用瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚评估儿童气管插管条件。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2004 Jun;14(6):452-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01208.x.
6
Comparison of cardiovascular changes during anaesthesia and recovery from propofol-alfentanil-nitrous oxide and thiopentone-halothane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in children undergoing otolaryngological surgery.丙泊酚-阿芬太尼-氧化亚氮与硫喷妥钠-氟烷-氧化亚氮麻醉下小儿耳鼻喉科手术期间及苏醒过程中心血管变化的比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993 Nov;37(8):737-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1993.tb03800.x.
7
Comparison of intubation following propofol and alfentanil with intubation following thiopentone and suxamethonium.丙泊酚与阿芬太尼诱导插管与硫喷妥钠与琥珀胆碱诱导插管的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1993 Oct;48(10):876-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07418.x.
8
Rapid tracheal intubation with propofol, alfentanil and a standard dose of vecuronium.
Br J Anaesth. 1997 Sep;79(3):384-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/79.3.384.
9
Influence of induction technique on intubating conditions after rocuronium in adults: comparison with rapid-sequence induction using thiopentone and suxamethonium.诱导技术对成人罗库溴铵后插管条件的影响:与硫喷妥钠和琥珀胆碱快速顺序诱导的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1996 Sep;77(3):339-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.3.339.
10
Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular block in children.
Br J Anaesth. 1994 Apr;72(4):403-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.4.403.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Propofol in Comparison with Other General Anesthetics for Surgery in Children Younger than 3 Years: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评价丙泊酚与其他全身麻醉剂用于 3 岁以下儿童手术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Apr 22;34(15):e124. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e124.
2
Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery.小儿门诊手术的静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 7;2014(2):CD009015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009015.pub2.
3
[Muscle relaxants are obligatory for pediatric intubation: con].
[肌肉松弛剂是小儿插管所必需的:反对意见] (你提供的原文最后有个“con”,不太明确其准确含义,从字面看可能是“反对”之类的意思,按照这样理解进行了翻译,你可根据实际情况调整)
Anaesthesist. 2011 May;60(5):476-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1879-y.