Annila P, Viitanen H, Reinikainen P, Baer G, Lindgren L
Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999 Jun;16(6):359-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00484.x.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of three different induction techniques, with or without neuromuscular block, on tracheal intubation, haemodynamic responses and cardiac rhythm. Ninety children, aged 1-3 years, undergoing day-case adenoidectomy were randomly allocated to three groups: group TS received thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 and suxamethonium 1.5 mg kg-1, group H 5 Vol.% halothane and group PA alfentanil 10 micrograms kg-1 and propofol 3 mg kg-1 for induction of anaesthesia. No anti-cholinergics were used. Holter-monitoring of the heart rate and rhythm was started at least 15 min before induction of anaesthesia and continued until 3 min after intubation. Tracheal intubation was performed by an anaesthetist blinded to the induction method and judged as excellent, moderate or poor according to ease of laryngoscopy, position of vocal cords and incidence of coughing after intubation. Tracheal intubation was successful at the first attempt in all children in groups TS and H and but only in 80% in group PA (P = 0.001). Intubating conditions were excellent in 22 (73%), 22 (73%) and one (3%) of the patients in groups TS, H and PA, respectively (P = 0.001). Cardiac dysrhythmias (supraventricular extrasystole or junctional rhythm) occurred in two (7%) patients in groups PA and H each (NS). Bradycardia occurred in 0 (0%), four (14%) and six (21%) children in groups TS, H and PA, respectively (P = 0.007 PA vs. TS, P = 0.03 H vs. TS). In conclusion, induction of anaesthesia with propofol 3 mg kg-1 and alfentanil 10 micrograms kg-1 without neuromuscular block did not provide acceptable intubating conditions in children 1-3 years, although it preserved arterial pressure better than thiopentone/suxamethonium or halothane. Cardiac dysrhythmias were few regardless of the induction method.
本研究的目的是比较三种不同诱导技术(有无神经肌肉阻滞)对气管插管、血流动力学反应和心律的影响。90名年龄在1至3岁接受日间腺样体切除术的儿童被随机分为三组:TS组接受硫喷妥钠5mg/kg和琥珀胆碱1.5mg/kg;H组接受5%体积分数的氟烷;PA组接受阿芬太尼10μg/kg和丙泊酚3mg/kg用于麻醉诱导。未使用抗胆碱能药物。在麻醉诱导前至少15分钟开始进行动态心电图监测心率和心律,并持续至插管后3分钟。气管插管由对诱导方法不知情的麻醉医生进行,根据喉镜检查的难易程度、声带位置和插管后咳嗽发生率判断为优、中或差。TS组和H组所有儿童首次气管插管均成功,而PA组仅80%成功(P = 0.001)。TS组、H组和PA组分别有22例(73%)、22例(73%)和1例(3%)患者的插管条件为优(P = 0.001)。PA组和H组各有2例(7%)患者发生心律失常(室上性早搏或交界性心律)(无显著性差异)。TS组无一例(0%)、H组4例(14%)、PA组6例(21%)儿童发生心动过缓(PA组与TS组比较,P = 0.007;H组与TS组比较,P = 0.03)。总之,对于1至3岁儿童,3mg/kg丙泊酚和10μg/kg阿芬太尼在无神经肌肉阻滞情况下进行麻醉诱导,虽比硫喷妥钠/琥珀胆碱或氟烷能更好地维持动脉压,但不能提供可接受的插管条件。无论采用何种诱导方法,心律失常均较少见。