• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实现认知结构化的需求与能力:调节压力对信息处理影响的个体差异。

The need and ability to achieve cognitive structuring: individual differences that moderate the effect of stress on information processing.

作者信息

Bar-Tal Y, Raviv A, Spitzer A

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jul;77(1):33-51. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.1.33.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.77.1.33
PMID:10434408
Abstract

The authors examined the hypothesis that the interaction between the need for cognitive structure (NCS) and the ability to achieve cognitive structure (AACS) moderates the effect of stress on information processing. NCS is the preference for using cognitive structuring, as opposed to piecemeal processes, as a means to achieve certainty. AACS is the extent to which individuals are able to apply information processes that are consistent with their levels of NCS. The hypothesis was validated in 4 studies, which showed that stress increased high-AACS participants' use of cognitive structuring if they had high NCS and reduced it if they had low NCS. An opposite effect was found for low-AACS participants. The implications of these results for the understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the effect of stress on information processing are discussed.

摘要

作者检验了以下假设

认知结构需求(NCS)与实现认知结构的能力(AACS)之间的相互作用会调节压力对信息处理的影响。NCS是指倾向于使用认知结构化而非零碎的过程作为实现确定性的手段。AACS是指个体能够应用与其NCS水平相一致的信息处理过程的程度。该假设在4项研究中得到了验证,研究表明,压力会增加高AACS参与者(如果他们有高NCS)对认知结构化的使用,而如果他们有低NCS则会减少这种使用。对于低AACS参与者则发现了相反的效果。文中讨论了这些结果对于理解压力对信息处理产生影响的机制的意义。

相似文献

1
The need and ability to achieve cognitive structuring: individual differences that moderate the effect of stress on information processing.实现认知结构化的需求与能力:调节压力对信息处理影响的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jul;77(1):33-51. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.1.33.
2
The effect on coping of monitoring, blunting, and the ability to achieve cognitive structure.监测、钝化以及实现认知结构的能力对应对的影响。
J Psychol. 1999 Jul;133(4):395-412. doi: 10.1080/00223989909599751.
3
The effects of monitoring and ability to achieve cognitive structure on the psychological distress during HIV testing.监测和认知结构实现能力对 HIV 检测期间心理困扰的影响。
Psychol Health. 2009 Oct;24(8):909-17. doi: 10.1080/08870440802106805.
4
The effect of stress on cognitive structuring: a cognitive motivational model.压力对认知结构的影响:认知动机模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013 Feb;17(1):87-99. doi: 10.1177/1088868312461309. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
5
Cognitive coping style (monitoring and blunting) and the need for information, information satisfaction and shared decision making among patients with haematological malignancies.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的认知应对方式(监控与钝化)、信息需求、信息满意度及共同决策
Psychooncology. 2015 May;24(5):564-71. doi: 10.1002/pon.3699. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
6
Need for closure and heuristic information processing: the moderating role of the ability to achieve the need for closure.寻求封闭性和启发式信息处理:实现寻求封闭性需求的能力的调节作用。
Br J Psychol. 2013 Nov;104(4):457-80. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12001. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
7
An evolutionary perspective on information processing.信息处理的进化视角。
Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;6(2):312-30. doi: 10.1111/tops.12085. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
8
Are there gender differences in cognitive function, chronic stress, and neurobehavioral symptoms after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury?轻度至中度创伤性脑损伤后,认知功能、慢性应激和神经行为症状是否存在性别差异?
J Neurosci Nurs. 2012 Jun;44(3):124-33. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0b013e318252737d.
9
Global-local processing impacts academic risk taking.全局-局部加工影响学术冒险行为。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Dec;70(12):2434-2444. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1240815. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
10
Relationship between self-reported cognitive difficulties, objective neuropsychological test performance and psychological distress in chronic pain.慢性疼痛患者自报告认知困难与客观神经心理学测试表现和心理困扰的关系。
Eur J Pain. 2018 Mar;22(3):601-613. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1151. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality traits predict the need for cognitive closure in advanced undergraduate medical students.人格特质预测医科大学生对认知闭合的需求。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 8;24(1):1280. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06283-4.
2
What motivates information (non-)seeking behaviors about a healthy diet?是什么激发了关于健康饮食的信息寻求(或不寻求)行为?
J Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;30(3):451-469. doi: 10.1177/13591053241245263. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
3
Fighting Coronavirus One Personality at a Time: Need for Structure, Trait Victimhood, and Adherence to COVID-19 Health Guidelines.
一次对抗一种性格的冠状病毒:对结构的需求、特质受害者心态以及对COVID-19健康指南的遵守。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 30;11:576450. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576450. eCollection 2020.
4
Revealing Nuanced Relationships Among Cognitive Test Anxiety, Motivation, and Self-Regulation Through Curvilinear Analyses.通过曲线分析揭示认知测试焦虑、动机和自我调节之间的细微关系。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 15;11:1141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01141. eCollection 2020.
5
What Makes You Think That You Are a Health Expert? The Effect of Objective Knowledge and Cognitive Structuring on Self-Epistemic Authority.是什么让你觉得自己是健康专家?客观知识和认知结构对自我认知权威的影响。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018 Dec 31;14(4):186-191. doi: 10.5709/acp-0249-1. eCollection 2018.
6
Screening the Personal Need for the Structure and solving word problems with fractions.评估个人对结构的需求以及解决分数应用题。
Springerplus. 2016 May 17;5:652. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2285-3. eCollection 2016.
7
Search for Expectancy-Inconsistent Information Reduces Uncertainty Better: The Role of Cognitive Capacity.搜索与预期不符的信息能更好地减少不确定性:认知能力的作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 22;7:395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00395. eCollection 2016.
8
The closed-mindedness that wasn't: need for structure and expectancy-inconsistent information.并非封闭的思维:对结构和期望不一致信息的需求
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 2;6:896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00896. eCollection 2015.
9
When need for closure leads to positive attitudes towards a negatively stereotyped outgroup.当对了结的需求导致对一个受负面刻板印象影响的外群体持积极态度时。
Motiv Emot. 2015;39(1):88-98. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9414-5.