Tachi T
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Tokai University School of Medicine.
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1999;101(5):427-45.
This study investigated the association of family environment and symptomatic characteristics in eating disorders.
The subjects studied were 180 eating disorder patients who sought treatment at Tokai University Hospital and whose diagnoses were made using the SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R) modified for DSM-IV. The subjects consisted of 52 Anorexia Nervosa Restricting Type (AN/R), 40 Anorexia Nervosa Binge-Eating/Purging Type (AN/BP), 57 Bulimia Nervosa Purging Type (BN/P), 17 Bulimia Nervosa Nonpurging Type (BN/NP) and 14 Binge-Eating Disorder (BED). All subjects were given the Family Adaptability & Cohesion Evaluation Scales III (FACES-III). Seventy eight female college students were administered the FACES-III, as normal controls.
On the cohesion (CO) dimensions of FACES-III, most AN/R perceived their families as significantly enmeshed (high CO), whereas most BN and BED perceived their families as disengaged (low CO). The families of AN/BP rated lower CO than AN/R, and higher CO than BN. On the adaptability dimension of FACES-III, most AN/BP and BED perceived their families as rigid, and most BN/P perceived their families either rigid or chaotic.
本研究调查了家庭环境与饮食失调症状特征之间的关联。
研究对象为180名在东海大学医院寻求治疗的饮食失调患者,其诊断采用了针对DSM-IV修改的SCID(DSM-III-R结构化临床访谈)。研究对象包括52例限制型神经性厌食症(AN/R)、40例暴食/清除型神经性厌食症(AN/BP)、57例清除型神经性贪食症(BN/P)、17例非清除型神经性贪食症(BN/NP)和14例暴饮暴食症(BED)。所有研究对象均接受了家庭适应性与凝聚性评估量表III(FACES-III)。78名女大学生作为正常对照接受了FACES-III测试。
在FACES-III的凝聚性(CO)维度上,大多数AN/R患者认为他们的家庭高度相互纠缠(高CO),而大多数BN和BED患者认为他们的家庭关系松散(低CO)。AN/BP患者的家庭CO评分低于AN/R患者,高于BN患者。在FACES-III的适应性维度上,大多数AN/BP和BED患者认为他们的家庭僵化,大多数BN/P患者认为他们的家庭要么僵化要么混乱。
1)饮食失调患者的家庭环境在凝聚性的连续体上存在差异,从AN/R(相互纠缠)到AN/BP(中等凝聚性)、BN(关系松散)再到BED(关系最松散)。这表明相互纠缠的家庭环境可能与限制饮食的严重程度有关。此外,关系松散的家庭环境可能与暴饮暴食的发作有关。2)还表明适应性维度上的两个极端,即僵化和混乱,是家庭环境的特征,这可能会促使并维持暴饮暴食和清除症状。3)针对AN/R的结果提出了两个关于家庭影响的假设。(a)家庭环境相互纠缠的AN/R患者未来不会出现贪食症状。(b)家庭环境关系松散,特别是氛围僵化或混乱的AN/R患者,日后发展为贪食症的风险较高。4)作者讨论了在未来饮食失调的诊断分类中,应根据对两组家庭环境的分析,建议将AN/BP分为两个类别:暴食亚型和非暴食亚型。5)比较日本BED患者和西方BED患者的家庭环境表明,日本BED患者的精神病理学可能更严重。作者讨论了BED与边缘型人格障碍的共病情况,以及社会对BED临床特征的影响。