• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用TG 23测试包对两个商用三维治疗计划系统进行剂量验证。

Dosimetric verification of two commercially available three-dimensional treatment planning systems using the TG 23 test package.

作者信息

Ramsey C R, Cordrey I L, Spencer K M, Oliver A L

机构信息

Thompson Cancer Survival Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 1999 Jul;26(7):1188-95. doi: 10.1118/1.598614.

DOI:10.1118/1.598614
PMID:10435518
Abstract

The Task Group 23 (TG-23) radiation treatment planning dosimetry verification package was used to evaluate the dosimetric accuracy of two commercially available treatment planning systems. The TG-23 test package contains experimentally measured beam data for two x-ray beams (4 and 18 MV) that can be used as input for 3D-RTP (three-dimensional radiation treatment planning) systems. Once the beam data is entered and modeled, a series of test cases are performed that isolate different aspects of the dose computational process. The computed values from the 3D-RTP system are compared against the measured dosimetry data, included in the package, for a set of comparison points within each test case. Both of the treatment planning systems that were studied provided excellent agreement between computed and measured doses. The cumulative 4 and 18 MV TG-23 test results for the convolution/superposition based planning system indicates that 96% of the dosimetric test points are within +/-2%, and 98% are within +/-3% of the tabulated TG-23 values. The dosimetric TG-23 test results for the pencil beam kernel based planning system are similar, with 96% of the test points falling within +/-2%, and 99% falling within +/-3% of the TG-23 measurements.

摘要

任务组23(TG - 23)放射治疗计划剂量学验证包用于评估两种商用治疗计划系统的剂量学准确性。TG - 23测试包包含两个X射线束(4和18 MV)的实验测量束数据,可作为三维放射治疗计划(3D - RTP)系统的输入。一旦输入束数据并进行建模,就会执行一系列测试用例,以分离剂量计算过程的不同方面。将3D - RTP系统的计算值与包中包含的测量剂量学数据进行比较,针对每个测试用例中的一组比较点。所研究的两种治疗计划系统在计算剂量和测量剂量之间都具有很好的一致性。基于卷积/叠加的计划系统的4和18 MV TG - 23累积测试结果表明,96%的剂量学测试点在TG - 23表格值的±2%范围内,98%在±3%范围内。基于笔形束核的计划系统的剂量学TG - 23测试结果类似,96%的测试点落在TG - 23测量值的±2%范围内,99%落在±3%范围内。

相似文献

1
Dosimetric verification of two commercially available three-dimensional treatment planning systems using the TG 23 test package.使用TG 23测试包对两个商用三维治疗计划系统进行剂量验证。
Med Phys. 1999 Jul;26(7):1188-95. doi: 10.1118/1.598614.
2
Application of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 23 test package for comparison of two treatment planning systems for photon external beam radiotherapy.应用美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)放射治疗委员会任务组23测试包比较两种光子外照射放疗治疗计划系统。
Med Phys. 1997 Dec;24(12):2043-54. doi: 10.1118/1.598119.
3
Dosimetric evaluation of two radiotherapy treatment planning systems using report 55 by the AAPM task group 23.使用美国医学物理学家协会任务组23的第55号报告对两种放射治疗治疗计划系统进行剂量学评估。
Tumori. 2002 Jan-Feb;88(1):53-8.
4
Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3D treatment planning system using the AAPM Task Group 23 test package.使用美国医学物理师协会任务组23测试包对商用三维治疗计划系统进行剂量学评估。
Med Phys. 2005 Mar;32(3):744-51. doi: 10.1118/1.1863460.
5
Beam modeling and verification of a photon beam multisource model.
Med Phys. 2005 Jun;32(6):1722-37. doi: 10.1118/1.1898485.
6
Application of a test package in an intercomparison of the photon dose calculation performance of treatment planning systems used in a clinical setting.在临床环境中使用的治疗计划系统的光子剂量计算性能的比对中应用测试包。
Radiother Oncol. 2001 Aug;60(2):203-13. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00304-8.
7
Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial 3-D treatment planning system using Report 55 by AAPM Task Group 23.使用美国医学物理学家协会任务组23的第55号报告对一种商用三维治疗计划系统进行剂量学评估。
Radiother Oncol. 1999 Jul;52(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00085-7.
8
Pencil beam approach for correcting the energy dependence artifact in film dosimetry for IMRT verification.用于校正调强放疗验证中胶片剂量测定能量依赖性伪影的笔形束方法。
Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3690-9. doi: 10.1118/1.2229425.
9
Monte Carlo photon beam modeling and commissioning for radiotherapy dose calculation algorithm.用于放射治疗剂量计算算法的蒙特卡罗光子束建模与调试
Phys Med. 2014 Nov;30(7):833-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
10
Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.临床电子束剂量测定法建议:对第25任务组建议的补充
Med Phys. 2009 Jul;36(7):3239-79. doi: 10.1118/1.3125820.

引用本文的文献

1
Dosimetric evaluation of a three-dimensional treatment planning system.三维治疗计划系统的剂量学评估
J Med Phys. 2011 Jan;36(1):15-21. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.75467.
2
Optimization of photon beam energy in aperture-based inverse planning.基于孔径的逆向规划中光子束能量的优化。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 Sep 3;10(4):36-54. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.3012.
3
Experimental validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm.Eclipse AAA算法的实验验证。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007 May 10;8(2):76-92. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v8i2.2350.
4
A comparison of two commercial treatment-planning systems to IMRT.两种商业治疗计划系统与调强放射治疗的比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2005 Summer;6(3):63-80. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2054. Epub 2005 Aug 12.
5
Comparison of monitor unit calculations performed with a 3D computerized planning system and independent "hand" calculations: results of three years clinical experience.使用三维计算机化计划系统进行的监测单位计算与独立“手工”计算的比较:三年临床经验结果
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2002 Autumn;3(4):293-301. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v3i4.2553.
6
Verification of tangential breast treatment dose calculations in a commercial 3D treatment planning system.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2001 Spring;2(2):73-84. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v2i2.2616.