• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯性肘关节脱位的治疗。固定时间会影响最终结果吗?

Management of simple elbow dislocations. Does the period of immobilization affect the eventual results?

作者信息

Schippinger G, Seibert F J, Steinböck J, Kucharczyk M

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, Karl Franzens University School of Medicine, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1999 Jun;384(3):294-7. doi: 10.1007/s004230050206.

DOI:10.1007/s004230050206
PMID:10437619
Abstract

METHODS

Forty-five patients with a simple elbow dislocation were re-examined at an average time of 61 months after injury. All patients were treated by means of closed reduction. Only patients with minor associated injuries were included in the study. The Morrey score was used to evaluate pain, limitation of motion, instability, and daily activities. The overall results were good or excellent with regard to pain and function. The most common finding was a loss of terminal extension. Nine percent of all patients had a lack of extension up to 30 degrees, while 36% had a flexion contracture of less than 10 degrees. Periarticular ossification was seen in 28 patients, but did not lead to loss of motion. For further analysis, the patients were divided into three groups of immobilization: group I, less than 2 weeks, group II, 2-3 weeks, and group III, more than 3 weeks.

RESULTS

We encountered better results from those in groups I and II with regard to pain and score results without any statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that splintage of the reduced elbow for 2 weeks enhances patient comfort and does not adversely affect the eventual outcome. Splintage for over 3 weeks may result in worse function.

摘要

方法

45例单纯肘关节脱位患者在受伤后平均61个月时接受复查。所有患者均采用闭合复位治疗。本研究仅纳入伴有轻微合并伤的患者。采用Morrey评分评估疼痛、活动受限、不稳定及日常活动情况。疼痛和功能方面的总体结果为良好或优秀。最常见的表现是终末伸展丧失。所有患者中有9%伸展缺失达30度,而36%有小于10度的屈曲挛缩。28例患者出现关节周围骨化,但未导致活动丧失。为进一步分析,将患者分为三组固定情况:I组,固定时间少于2周;II组,固定2 - 3周;III组,固定超过3周。

结果

I组和II组患者在疼痛和评分结果方面有更好的表现,但无统计学意义。

结论

我们的结果表明,复位后的肘关节固定2周可提高患者舒适度,且不会对最终结果产生不利影响。固定超过3周可能导致功能更差。

相似文献

1
Management of simple elbow dislocations. Does the period of immobilization affect the eventual results?单纯性肘关节脱位的治疗。固定时间会影响最终结果吗?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1999 Jun;384(3):294-7. doi: 10.1007/s004230050206.
2
The results of conservatively treated simple elbow dislocations.单纯肘关节脱位保守治疗的结果。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(3):199-205. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2400.
3
[Simple elbow dislocation. Comparison of long-term results after immobilization and functional treatment].[单纯性肘关节脱位。固定与功能治疗后的长期结果比较]
Unfallchirurg. 1993 Oct;96(10):529-33.
4
[Isolated dislocation of the elbow].[肘关节单纯脱位]
Swiss Surg. 1997;3(4):172-6.
5
Comparative study of simple and complex open elbow dislocations.单纯性与复杂性肘后脱位的对比研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2037-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3491-3.
6
Interventions for treating acute elbow dislocations in adults.成人急性肘关节脱位的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD007908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007908.pub2.
7
Acute elbow dislocation: evaluation and management.急性肘关节脱位:评估与处理
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998 Jan-Feb;6(1):15-23. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199801000-00002.
8
Patient-reported outcomes after simple dislocation of the elbow.单纯性肘关节脱位后的患者报告结局。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 6;93(13):1220-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00860.
9
Terrible triad injuries of the elbow: does the coronoid always need to be fixed?肘部三联征损伤:是否需要固定喙突?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2084-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3471-7.
10
Simple elbow dislocations: evaluation, management, and outcomes.简单肘关节脱位:评估、处理和结果。
Phys Sportsmed. 2012 Feb;40(1):62-71. doi: 10.3810/psm.2012.02.1952.

引用本文的文献

1
Conservative and surgical management of simple elbow dislocations: SMDA-SEC consensus and guidelines.单纯性肘关节脱位的保守与手术治疗:SMDA-SEC共识与指南
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2025 Apr 29;17:133988. doi: 10.52965/001c.133988. eCollection 2025.
2
Treatment strategies for simple elbow dislocation - a systematic review.单纯性肘关节脱位的治疗策略——系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 16;25(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07260-0.
3
Preclinical Models of Elbow Injury and Pathology.肘部损伤与病理的临床前模型
Ann Jt. 2021 Jan;6. doi: 10.21037/aoj.2020.02.09. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
4
A novel mouse model of hindlimb joint contracture with 3D-printed casts.一种新型的 3D 打印外固定鼠后肢关节挛缩模型。
J Orthop Res. 2022 Dec;40(12):2865-2872. doi: 10.1002/jor.25313. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
5
Early functional mobilization for non-operative treatment of simple elbow dislocations: a systematic review.单纯性肘关节脱位非手术治疗的早期功能活动:一项系统评价
Shoulder Elbow. 2022 Apr;14(2):211-221. doi: 10.1177/1758573220957631. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
6
A Rare Case of Traumatic Bilateral Elbow Dislocation Without a Fracture in a Seven-Year-Old Female Child.一名7岁女童双侧创伤性肘关节脱位且无骨折的罕见病例。
Cureus. 2021 Nov 11;13(11):e19459. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19459. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Early mobilization versus plaster immobilization of simple elbow dislocations: a cost analysis of the FuncSiE multicenter randomized clinical trial.早期活动与单纯肘关节脱位石膏固定的比较:FuncSiE 多中心随机临床试验的成本分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Jul;140(7):877-886. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03309-1. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
8
Successful Closed Manipulation of Simple Lateral Dislocation of the Elbow Joint: A Case Report.肘关节单纯外侧脱位成功闭合手法复位:一例报告
Oman Med J. 2013 Nov;28(6):e062. doi: 10.5001/omj.2013.131.
9
Reasons for surgical revision after conservatively treated radial head fractures-retrospective study of 70 patients.保守治疗桡骨头骨折后进行手术翻修的原因——70例患者的回顾性研究
Obere Extrem. 2018;13(2):112-120. doi: 10.1007/s11678-018-0456-2. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
Epidemiologic features and management of elbow dislocation with associated fracture in pediatric population.小儿肘关节脱位伴骨折的流行病学特征及治疗
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(48):e8595. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008595.