Kocovic D Z, Harada T, Friedman P L, Stevenson W G
Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Aug;34(2):381-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00205-3.
The purpose of this study was to determine the relation of isolated potentials (IPs) recorded during ventricular tachycardia (VT) to reentry circuit sites identified by entrainment.
Reentry circuits causing VT late after myocardial infarction are complex. Both IPs and entrainment have been useful for identifying successful ablation sites, but the relation of IPs to the location in the reentry circuit as determined by entrainment has not been completely defined.
Data from catheter mapping of 70 monomorphic VTs in 36 patients with prior myocardial infarction were retrospectively analyzed. Entrainment followed by radiofrequency current (RF) ablation was performed at 384 sites. On the basis of entrainment, sites were classified as reentry circuit exit, central-proximal, inner or outer loop sites. Sites outside the circuit were divided into remote and adjacent bystanders.
Isolated potentials were recorded at 50% (51 of 101) of reentry circuit exit, central and proximal sites as compared with only 8% (11 of 146, p < 0.001) of inner loop and outer loop sites and only 1.8% (2 of 106) of remote bystander sites (p < 0.001). Isolated potentials were also present at 45% of adjacent bystander sites. At central and proximal sites the presence of an IP increased the incidence of tachycardia termination by RF to 47.5% from 24% (p = 0.05). At exit sites tachycardia termination occurred frequently regardless of the presence or absence of IPs (45% vs. 48%, p = NS). Isolated potentials at exit, central and proximal sites had a shorter duration at sites where ablation terminated VT than at sites without termination (20.9 +/- 9.6 ms vs. 35.7 +/- 15.3 ms, p < 0.001).
Isolated potentials are a useful guide to sites in the central-proximal region of the reentry circuit, but often fail to identify exit sites where ablation is successful. Entrainment and analysis of electrograms provide complementary information during mapping of VT.
本研究旨在确定室性心动过速(VT)期间记录的孤立电位(IPs)与通过拖带确定的折返环路部位之间的关系。
心肌梗死后晚期引起VT的折返环路很复杂。IPs和拖带都有助于确定成功的消融部位,但IPs与通过拖带确定的折返环路位置之间的关系尚未完全明确。
回顾性分析36例既往有心肌梗死患者的70次单形性VT的导管标测数据。在384个部位进行拖带后行射频电流(RF)消融。根据拖带情况,将部位分为折返环路出口、中央-近端、内环或外环部位。环路外的部位分为远处旁观者和相邻旁观者。
在折返环路出口、中央和近端部位,50%(101个部位中的51个)记录到孤立电位,而内环和外环部位仅8%(146个部位中的11个,p<0.001)记录到,远处旁观者部位仅1.8%(106个部位中的2个,p<0.001)记录到。相邻旁观者部位也有45%记录到孤立电位。在中央和近端部位,存在IP时,RF终止心动过速的发生率从24%提高到47.5%(p=0.05)。在出口部位,无论有无IP,心动过速终止均频繁发生(45%对48%,p=无显著差异)。出口、中央和近端部位的孤立电位在消融终止VT的部位持续时间比未终止的部位短(20.9±9.6毫秒对35.7±15.3毫秒,p<0.001)。
孤立电位是折返环路中央-近端区域部位的有用指导,但往往无法识别消融成功的出口部位。在VT标测期间,拖带和电图分析提供互补信息。