• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于自主智能巡航控制安全评估的碰撞模型

A collision model for safety evaluation of autonomous intelligent cruise control.

作者信息

Touran A, Brackstone M A, McDonald M

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 1999 Sep;31(5):567-78. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00013-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00013-5
PMID:10440554
Abstract

This paper describes a general framework for safety evaluation of autonomous intelligent cruise control in rear-end collisions. Using data and specifications from prototype devices, two collision models are developed. One model considers a train of four cars, one of which is equipped with autonomous intelligent cruise control. This model considers the car in front and two cars following the equipped car. In the second model, none of the cars is equipped with the device. Each model can predict the possibility of rear-end collision between cars under various conditions by calculating the remaining distance between cars after the front car brakes. Comparing the two collision models allows one to evaluate the effectiveness of autonomous intelligent cruise control in preventing collisions. The models are then subjected to Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the probability of collision. Based on crash probabilities, an expected value is calculated for the number of cars involved in any collision. It is found that given the model assumptions, while equipping a car with autonomous intelligent cruise control can significantly reduce the probability of the collision with the car ahead, it may adversely affect the situation for the following cars.

摘要

本文描述了一种用于评估自动智能巡航控制系统在追尾碰撞中安全性的通用框架。利用原型设备的数据和规格,开发了两种碰撞模型。一种模型考虑一列四辆车,其中一辆配备自动智能巡航控制系统。该模型考虑了前车以及配备该系统车辆后面的两辆车。在第二种模型中,没有车辆配备该设备。每个模型都可以通过计算前车刹车后车辆之间的剩余距离,预测在各种条件下车辆之间发生追尾碰撞的可能性。比较这两种碰撞模型可以评估自动智能巡航控制系统在预防碰撞方面的有效性。然后对模型进行蒙特卡洛模拟以计算碰撞概率。基于碰撞概率,计算出任何碰撞中涉及车辆数量的期望值。结果发现,在给定模型假设的情况下,虽然给一辆车配备自动智能巡航控制系统可以显著降低与前车碰撞的概率,但这可能会对后面的车辆产生不利影响。

相似文献

1
A collision model for safety evaluation of autonomous intelligent cruise control.用于自主智能巡航控制安全评估的碰撞模型
Accid Anal Prev. 1999 Sep;31(5):567-78. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00013-5.
2
AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder.基于行车记录仪视频的汽车与自行车事故重建对自动紧急制动(AEB)有效性的评估
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(1):100-106. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1533247. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
3
Assessing rear-end collision risk of cars and heavy vehicles on freeways using a surrogate safety measure.利用替代安全措施评估高速公路上汽车和重型车辆的追尾碰撞风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Apr;113:149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.033. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
4
Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.量产前碰撞和车道偏离预警系统预期的碰撞减少及伤害降低情况比较。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S109-14. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1063619.
5
Predicting the effect of various ISA penetration grades on pedestrian safety by simulation.通过模拟预测不同国际安全评估(ISA)渗透率等级对行人安全的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):1162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.017. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
6
Change in the collision avoidance performance of autonomous emergency braking systems.自动紧急制动系统避撞性能的变化
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025;26(2):139-145. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2394975. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
7
Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways.评估自适应巡航控制对高速公路交通振荡的安全影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jul;104:137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.025. Epub 2017 May 10.
8
Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.前方碰撞预警和自动紧急制动系统在降低前后碰撞率方面的有效性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):142-152. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
9
Have pedestrian subsystem tests improved passenger car front shape?行人子系统测试是否改善了乘用车前部形状?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
10
Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system.通过车路集成的可变限速控制和自适应巡航控制系统降低追尾碰撞风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Aug 17;17(6):597-603. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1121384. Epub 2016 Jan 13.