Suppr超能文献

重症社区获得性肺炎:如何评估疾病严重程度。

Severe community-acquired pneumonia: how to assess illness severity.

作者信息

Ewig S, Torres A

机构信息

Medizinische Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik, Dept of Internal Medicine, Respiratory Medicine, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1999 Jun;54(3):250-4.

Abstract

The assessment of severity is one of the most important issues in the management of the patient with community-acquired pneumonia. If forms the basis of decisions about hospitalization or admission to an intensive care unit. Age, comorbid illness and vital sign abnormalities have been shown to represent the principal criteria of pneumonia severity. Severe community-acquired pneumonia is characterized by one or more of the following criteria: acute respiratory failure, haemodynamic compromise, severe sepsis and septic shock, multilobar radiographic infiltrates, plus some additional laboratory parameters (blood urea nitrogen > 7 mM, lactate dehydrogenase > 260 U.L-1 and low serum albumin at admission). Several sets of corresponding simple clinical and laboratory criteria have consistently been shown to have considerable potential in predicting death caused by pneumonia. It was recently found that the tentative definition of severe community-acquired pneumonia provided by the American Thoracic Society guidelines is highly sensitive but poorly specific. An alternative rule, defining severe pneumonia as the presence of two of three minor criteria (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, multilobar involvement and arterial oxygen tension/inspiratory oxygen fraction < 250) or one of two major criteria (mechanical ventilation and septic shock), had a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 75% and a negative predictive value of 95%. When validated in an independent patient population, this rule may contribute to a more uniform definition of severe community-acquired pneumonia.

摘要

严重程度评估是社区获得性肺炎患者管理中最重要的问题之一。它构成了关于住院或入住重症监护病房决策的基础。年龄、合并症和生命体征异常已被证明是肺炎严重程度的主要标准。重症社区获得性肺炎的特征为符合以下一项或多项标准:急性呼吸衰竭、血流动力学障碍、严重脓毒症和感染性休克、多叶影像学浸润,以及一些其他实验室参数(入院时血尿素氮>7 mM、乳酸脱氢酶>260 U.L-1和低血清白蛋白)。几组相应的简单临床和实验室标准一直被证明在预测肺炎所致死亡方面具有相当大的潜力。最近发现,美国胸科学会指南提供的重症社区获得性肺炎暂行定义敏感性高但特异性差。另一种标准将重症肺炎定义为三项次要标准中的两项(收缩压<90 mmHg、多叶受累和动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数<250)或两项主要标准中的一项(机械通气和感染性休克),其敏感性为78%,特异性为94%,阳性预测值为75%,阴性预测值为95%。在独立患者群体中得到验证后,该标准可能有助于对重症社区获得性肺炎作出更统一的定义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验