Suppr超能文献

重症社区获得性肺炎。严重程度标准的评估。

Severe community-acquired pneumonia. Assessment of severity criteria.

作者信息

Ewig S, Ruiz M, Mensa J, Marcos M A, Martinez J A, Arancibia F, Niederman M S, Torres A

机构信息

Servei de Pneumologia i Al.lèrgia Respiratoria, Servei de Malalties Infeccioces, Servei de Microbiologia, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Oct;158(4):1102-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9803114.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to validate the criteria used in the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Severe pneumonia was defined as admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Overall 331 nonsevere (84%) and 64 severe cases (16%) of CAP were prospectively studied. Mortality was 19 of 395 (5%) and 19 of 64 (30%), respectively. Single severity criteria as well as the ATS definition of severe pneumonia were assessed calculating the operative indices. A modified prediction rule including minor (baseline) and major (baseline or evolutionary) criteria was derived. Single minor criteria at admission had a low sensitivity and positive predictive value. Defining severe pneumonia according to the ATS guidelines had a high sensitivity (98%). However, specificity and positive predictive value were low (32% and 24%, respectively). A modified prediction rule (presence of two or three minor criteria [systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg, multilobar involvement, PaO2/FIO2 < 250] or one of two major criteria [requirement of mechanical ventilation, presence of septic shock]) had a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 75%, and a negative predictive value of 95%. The ATS definition of severe pneumonia was highly sensitive but insufficiently specific and had a low positive predictive value. Our suggested modified rule had a more balanced performance and, if validated in an independent population, may represent a more accurate definition of severe CAP.

摘要

本研究的目的是验证美国胸科学会(ATS)指南中用于重症社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的标准。重症肺炎定义为入住重症监护病房(ICU)。前瞻性研究了总共331例非重症(84%)和64例重症CAP病例(16%)。死亡率分别为395例中的19例(5%)和64例中的19例(30%)。通过计算手术指标评估单一严重程度标准以及ATS对重症肺炎的定义。得出了一个包括次要(基线)和主要(基线或进展性)标准的改良预测规则。入院时单一的次要标准敏感性和阳性预测值较低。根据ATS指南定义重症肺炎具有较高的敏感性(98%)。然而,特异性和阳性预测值较低(分别为32%和24%)。一个改良的预测规则(存在两个或三个次要标准[收缩压<90 mmHg、多叶受累、PaO2/FIO2<250]或两个主要标准之一[需要机械通气、存在感染性休克])的敏感性为78%,特异性为94%,阳性预测值为75%,阴性预测值为95%。ATS对重症肺炎的定义敏感性高但特异性不足且阳性预测值低。我们建议的改良规则表现更为平衡,若在独立人群中得到验证,则可能代表对重症CAP更准确的定义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验