Wiessing L G, Houweling H, Sandfort T G, Schop W, van den Akker R, Hoogenveen R T
Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Eur J Epidemiol. 1999 May;15(5):429-37. doi: 10.1023/a:1007548810129.
HIV surveillance in homosexual men is poor in most countries, as this risk group is difficult to sample. The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of reaching homosexual men for national HIV surveillance using gay community media. In 1989, a questionnaire on general gay issues, with a section on AIDS, was included in a widely sold gay magazine in the Netherlands. Among 17,700 sold copies, 1134 responses were obtained from males (6%). Of these, 669 men (59%) gave their address, of which in turn 84% responded to a questionnaire on risk behaviour in 1990. In 1991/1992, the 669 men were asked to participate in an HIV serosurvey, in which eventually 308 participated with a blood test (46%) and 147 without (total 68%). Participation in the serosurvey with blood test was associated with reporting multiple partners in 1989. Twenty participants were infected (6.5%). In logistic regression analysis, risk factors for infection were recent unprotected receptive anal intercourse with multiple partners (odds ratio (OR): 10.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): (2.18-52.2); one partner 1.17 (0.31-4.48); none 1) and living in Amsterdam (OR: 3.92; 95% CI: (0.99-15.5); urbanised western Netherlands 2.15 (0.57-8.03); elsewhere 1), while a high educational level was protective (OR: 0.29 (0.08-0.96); middle 0.41 (0.11-1.54); low 1). Among those who participated in 1991/1992, risk behaviour increased between 1989 and 1991/1992 (reporting multiple casual partners rose from 55% to 64%; reporting inconsistent condom use with receptive anal sex from 58% to 71%). Using a predictive model which included self-reported serostatus in 1989, the HIV prevalence rate in 1991/1992 among all male responders to the 1989 questionnaire was estimated to be 5.3% (95% CI: 3.1 7.7%). In conclusion, unless initial response is improved, recruitment through a gay magazine may not allow reliable estimates of HIV prevalence in homosexual men. However, it can be useful at the national level for monitoring changes in prevalence and risk behaviour over time, geographical differences and risk factors for infection.
在大多数国家,对男同性恋者的艾滋病毒监测情况不佳,因为这个风险群体很难进行抽样。本研究的目的是测试利用同性恋社区媒体对男同性恋者进行全国性艾滋病毒监测的可行性。1989年,一份关于一般性同性恋问题并包含一个艾滋病章节的问卷被纳入荷兰一本广泛发行的同性恋杂志中。在售出的17700份杂志中,收到了1134名男性的回复(6%)。其中,669名男性(59%)提供了他们的地址,而这669名男性中又有84%回复了1990年一份关于危险行为的问卷。1991/1992年,邀请这669名男性参加一项艾滋病毒血清学调查,最终308人接受了血液检测(46%),147人未接受检测(总计68%)。参与血液检测的血清学调查与1989年报告有多个性伴侣有关。20名参与者被感染(6.5%)。在逻辑回归分析中,感染的危险因素包括近期与多个性伴侣发生无保护的接受性肛交(比值比(OR):10.7;95%置信区间(CI):(2.18 - 52.2);与一名性伴侣发生性行为为1.17(0.31 - 4.48);无性行为为1)以及居住在阿姆斯特丹(OR:3.92;95% CI:(0.99 - 15.5);荷兰西部城市化地区为2.15(0.57 - 8.03);其他地区为1),而高学历具有保护作用(OR:0.29(0.08 - 0.96);中等学历为0.41(0.11 - 1.54);低学历为1)。在1991/1992年参与调查的人中,1989年至1991/1992年期间危险行为有所增加(报告有多个临时性伴侣的比例从55%上升到64%;报告在接受性肛交时不坚持使用避孕套的比例从58%上升到71%)。使用一个包含1989年自我报告血清状态的预测模型,估计1991/1992年所有回复1989年问卷的男性中艾滋病毒流行率为5.3%(95% CI:3.1 - 7.7%)。总之,除非提高初始回复率,通过同性恋杂志招募可能无法对男同性恋者中的艾滋病毒流行率进行可靠估计。然而,在国家层面,它对于监测流行率和危险行为随时间的变化、地理差异以及感染危险因素可能是有用的。