• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因果条件句推理的发展

The development of reasoning with causal conditionals.

作者信息

Janveau-Brennan G, Markovits H

机构信息

Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 1999 Jul;35(4):904-11. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.4.904.

DOI:10.1037//0012-1649.35.4.904
PMID:10442860
Abstract

A total of 512 children in Grades 1 through 6 received a conditional inference task using causal conditionals (If cause P, then effect Q) and a generation of alternatives task. The inference task used premises for which there were few or many possible alternative causes. Results show a steady age-related increase in uncertainty responses to the two uncertain logical forms, affirmation of consequent (AC) and denial of antecedent (DA), and an increase in production of disabling conditions for modus ponens. More uncertainty responses were produced to AC and DA with premises with many possible alternatives. Individual differences in inference production were related to numbers of alternatives produced in the generation task. Results support the idea that both developmental and individual differences in reasoning can be at least partially explained by differential access to knowledge stored in long-term memory.

摘要

共有512名一至六年级的儿童接受了一项使用因果条件句(如果原因P,那么结果Q)的条件推理任务和一项生成替代项任务。推理任务使用了存在少量或大量可能替代原因的前提。结果显示,随着年龄的增长,对两种不确定逻辑形式,即肯定后件(AC)和否定前件(DA)的不确定性反应稳步增加,并且在肯定前件推理中产生的失效条件也有所增加。对于存在大量可能替代项的前提,在AC和DA中产生的不确定性反应更多。推理产生中的个体差异与生成任务中产生的替代项数量有关。结果支持这样一种观点,即推理中的发展差异和个体差异至少可以部分地通过对存储在长期记忆中的知识的不同获取来解释。

相似文献

1
The development of reasoning with causal conditionals.因果条件句推理的发展
Dev Psychol. 1999 Jul;35(4):904-11. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.4.904.
2
Developmental and content effects in reasoning with causal conditionals.因果条件推理中的发展及内容效应
J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Mar;81(3):235-48. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2001.2652.
3
Inference suppression and semantic memory retrieval: every counterexample counts.推理抑制与语义记忆检索:每个反例都很重要。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jun;31(4):581-95. doi: 10.3758/bf03196099.
4
Causal conditional reasoning and semantic memory retrieval: a test of the semantic memory framework.因果条件推理与语义记忆检索:语义记忆框架的一项测试
Mem Cognit. 2002 Sep;30(6):908-20. doi: 10.3758/bf03195776.
5
Efficiency of retrieval correlates with "logical" reasoning from causal conditional premises.检索效率与基于因果条件前提的“逻辑”推理相关。
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul;30(5):696-706. doi: 10.3758/bf03196426.
6
Reasoning With Conditionals About Everyday and Mathematical Concepts in Primary School.小学阶段关于日常和数学概念的条件推理
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 29;11:531640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531640. eCollection 2020.
7
Conditional reasoning and causation.条件推理与因果关系。
Mem Cognit. 1991 May;19(3):274-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03211151.
8
On the road toward formal reasoning: reasoning with factual causal and contrary-to-fact causal premises during early adolescence.在通向形式推理的道路上:青春期早期基于事实性因果前提和反事实因果前提的推理
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Dec;128:37-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
Developmental trends in everyday conditional reasoning: the retrieval and inhibition interplay.日常条件推理的发展趋势:检索与抑制的相互作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Aug;100(4):252-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Apr 21.
10
The effect of explicit negatives and of different contrast classes on conditional syllogisms.明确否定和不同对比类别对条件三段论的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2000 Nov;91 ( Pt 4):533-50. doi: 10.1348/000712600161970.

引用本文的文献

1
Methylation Analysis of Urinary Sample in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Carcinoma: Frequency and Management of Invalid Result.非肌层浸润性膀胱癌尿液样本的甲基化分析:无效结果的发生率及处理
Biomedicines. 2023 Dec 12;11(12):3288. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11123288.
2
Reasoning With Conditionals About Everyday and Mathematical Concepts in Primary School.小学阶段关于日常和数学概念的条件推理
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 29;11:531640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531640. eCollection 2020.
3
The development of fast and slow inferential responding: Evidence for a parallel development of rule-based and belief-based intuitions.
快速和慢速推理反应的发展:基于规则和基于信念的直觉并行发展的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Aug;47(6):1188-1200. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00927-3.
4
A Doubly Latent Space Joint Model for Local Item and Person Dependence in the Analysis of Item Response Data.在项目反应数据分析中用于局部项目和个体依赖的双重潜在空间联合模型。
Psychometrika. 2019 Mar;84(1):236-260. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9630-0. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
5
Reasoning from an incompatibility: False dilemma fallacies and content effects.从不相容性推理:虚假两难谬误和内容效应。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):657-670. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0804-x.
6
The capacity to generate alternative ideas is more important than inhibition for logical reasoning in preschool-age children.对于学龄前儿童的逻辑推理而言,产生替代想法的能力比抑制能力更为重要。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Feb;45(2):208-220. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0653-4.
7
How do pre-adolescent children interpret conditionals?青春期前的儿童如何理解条件句?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1907-1912. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1050-5.
8
Neural correlates of causal power judgments.因果力判断的神经关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 22;8:1014. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01014. eCollection 2014.
9
Development and necessary norms of reasoning.发展与推理的必要规范。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 23;5:488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00488. eCollection 2014.
10
More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning.更多关于条件推理双加工模型的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):736-47. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0186-4.