Müller-Wening D, Renck T, Neuhauss M
Zusamklinik der LVA Schwaben.
Pneumologie. 1999 Jul;53(7):364-8.
A 52 year old farmer was referred to us for investigation of suspected farmer's lung. For many years the farmer had been exposed to hay, straw, pigeons, and fuel chip dust. Under exertion he suffered from shortness of breath. In the farmer's own fuel chips we could identify Aspergillus fumigatus, Paecilomyces species and Mucor species. In the farmer's blood we found IgG-antibodies against his own fuel chips, thermophilic actinomycetes, Penicillium species, Mucor species and Aspergillus fumigatus. We did not detect any IgG-antibodies against pigeon serum or pigeon faeces. In order to determine the responsible allergen we performed two challenge tests. In the first test the farmer had to inhale his own hay and straw dust for one hour. This provocation was negative. A second one-hour inhalative challenge was carried out 16 days later using his own fuel chips. This time he experienced significant pulmonary and systemic reactions: body temperature rose by 3.3 degrees C, leucocytes by 12,200/mm3; PO2 fell by 39.4 mmHg, vital capacity by 52%, DLCO by 36%. After the challenge the farmer complained of coughing and dyspnoea. Rales could be heard on auscultation, and an interstitial infiltrate was seen to develop on chest x-rays. After the challenge the patient had to be treated with oxygen and systemic corticosteroids. We diagnosed a fuel chip-induced exogenous allergic alveolitis (EAA). Eight days later the parameters were back to normal and the farmer was discharged from our hospital with further corticosteroid medication. This method of inhalative provocation is very important in diagnosing an EAA. Problems arise when the mode and duration of exposure to substances has to be chosen. Because of the risk of severe reactions, inhalative provocations relating to EAAs should only be performed in special centres with an intensive care unit. In this paper we present a diagnosis of fuel chip lung, which is rarely seen in Germany. However, with the rising use of fuel chips as heating material it is necessary to consider this use as a cause of EAA among farmers.
一名52岁的农民因疑似农民肺被转诊至我院。多年来,该农民一直接触干草、稻草、鸽子和燃料木屑粉尘。用力时他会出现呼吸急促。在该农民自己的燃料木屑中,我们鉴定出烟曲霉、拟青霉属和毛霉属。在该农民的血液中,我们发现了针对其自己的燃料木屑、嗜热放线菌、青霉属、毛霉属和烟曲霉的IgG抗体。我们未检测到针对鸽血清或鸽粪的任何IgG抗体。为了确定致病过敏原,我们进行了两项激发试验。在第一次试验中,该农民必须吸入自己的干草和稻草粉尘1小时。此次激发试验结果为阴性。16天后,使用他自己的燃料木屑进行了第二次1小时的吸入激发试验。这次他出现了明显的肺部和全身反应:体温升高3.3摄氏度,白细胞计数升至12,200/mm³;动脉血氧分压下降39.4 mmHg,肺活量下降52%,一氧化碳弥散量下降36%。激发试验后,该农民主诉咳嗽和呼吸困难。听诊可闻及啰音,胸部X线片显示出现间质性浸润。激发试验后,患者必须接受吸氧和全身使用皮质类固醇治疗。我们诊断为燃料木屑诱发的外源性过敏性肺泡炎(EAA)。8天后各项参数恢复正常,该农民出院,并继续服用皮质类固醇药物。这种吸入激发试验方法在诊断EAA中非常重要。在选择接触物质的方式和持续时间时会出现问题。由于存在严重反应的风险,与EAA相关的吸入激发试验仅应在设有重症监护病房的特殊中心进行。在本文中,我们报告了一例燃料木屑肺的诊断,这在德国很少见。然而,随着燃料木屑作为取暖材料的使用增加,有必要将这种用途视为农民中EAA的一个病因。