Chang W H, Augustin B, Lane H Y, ZumBrunnen T, Liu H C, Kazmi Y, Jann M W
Laboratory of Biological Psychiatry, Taipei City, Psychiatric Center, Taiwan, ROC.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Jul;145(1):91-8. doi: 10.1007/s002130051036.
The drug-drug interaction between fluvoxamine (FLV) and clozapine (CLZ) was evaluated by in-vitro and in-vivo methods. In-vitro studies were conducted using human hepatic microsomal preparations with standard chemical inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 (CYP 450) isozyme system. Furafyline, FLV, troleandomycin (TAO) and erythromycin were used as the chemical inhibitors. For the in-vivo study, nine male schizophrenic patients were administered a single dose of CLZ 50 mg on two separate occasions with a 2-week FLV treatment of 50 mg twice a day in between each CLZ dose. Blood samples were obtained over 48 h following CLZ administration. CLZ and its two principle metabolites, clozapine N-oxide (CNO) and desmethylclozapine (DCLZ), were measured by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection for both in-vitro and in-vivo studies. The in-vitro formation of DCLZ was inhibited by furafyline and FLV by 42.0% and 48.5% (P<0.01), respectively. TAO and erythromycin had only modest inhibition effects on DCLZ formation of 18.3% and 21.0% (P = NS), respectively. CNO in-vitro formation was significantly reduced by TAO and erythromycin by 44.5% and 45.0% (P<0.01), respectively. Furafyline and FLV had only modest effects of 19.2% and 8.5% (P = NS), respectively. In schizophrenic patients, FLV resulted in a pronounced increased in CLZ plasma concentrations with the total mean CLZ AUC increased by a factor of 2.58 from 780.8 ng/ml per hour to 2218.0 ng/ml per hour (P<0.001). All patients were sedated during combined FLV and CLZ use. During FLV treatment, CNO and DCLZ AUC both decreased by 18.8% (P = 0.07) and 9.0% (P = NS), respectively. These results indicate that in-vitro evaluations may not always accurately reflect changes in drug-drug interaction observed in-vivo. Careful patient monitoring is recommended during FLV/CLZ co-administration.
通过体外和体内方法评估了氟伏沙明(FLV)与氯氮平(CLZ)之间的药物相互作用。体外研究使用人肝微粒体制剂以及细胞色素P450(CYP 450)同工酶系统的标准化学抑制剂进行。呋喃氟脲嘧啶、氟伏沙明、三乙酰竹桃霉素(TAO)和红霉素用作化学抑制剂。对于体内研究,9名男性精神分裂症患者在两个不同的场合分别单次服用50 mg氯氮平,在每次氯氮平给药之间进行为期2周的氟伏沙明治疗,每天两次,每次50 mg。在氯氮平给药后48小时内采集血样。在体外和体内研究中,通过高效液相色谱-紫外检测法测定氯氮平和其两种主要代谢物,氯氮平N-氧化物(CNO)和去甲氯氮平(DCLZ)。呋喃氟脲嘧啶和氟伏沙明对DCLZ的体外形成抑制率分别为42.0%和48.5%(P<0.01)。TAO和红霉素对DCLZ形成的抑制作用较小,分别为18.3%和21.0%(P =无显著性差异)。TAO和红霉素使CNO的体外形成分别显著降低44.5%和45.0%(P<0.01)。呋喃氟脲嘧啶和氟伏沙明的作用较小,分别为19.2%和8.5%(P =无显著性差异)。在精神分裂症患者中,氟伏沙明导致氯氮平血浆浓度显著升高,氯氮平的总平均曲线下面积(AUC)从每小时780.8 ng/ml增加到每小时2218.0 ng/ml,增加了2.58倍(P<0.001)。在联合使用氟伏沙明和氯氮平期间,所有患者均出现镇静作用。在氟伏沙明治疗期间,CNO和DCLZ的AUC分别下降了18.8%(P = 0.07)和9.0%(P =无显著性差异)。这些结果表明,体外评估可能并不总是准确反映体内观察到的药物相互作用变化。建议在氟伏沙明/氯氮平联合给药期间对患者进行仔细监测。