Wang H M, Jones M P, Burns T L
Department of Business Administration, Ling-Tung College, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Genet Epidemiol. 1999;17(3):174-87. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)17:3<174::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-G.
Regression diagnostic methods are developed and investigated under the Class A regressive model proposed by Bonney [(1984) Am J Med Genet 18:731-749]. We call a family whose phenotypic distribution does not conform to the same genetic model as the majority of the families an etiotic family. The exact case-deletion approach for identifying etiotic families, based on examining the changes in each model parameter estimate by excluding one family at a time, is very time-consuming. We proposed three alternative diagnostic methods: the empirical influence function (EIF), the one-step approximation, and the approximated one-step approach. These methods can be computed efficiently and were incorporated into the existing software package S.A.G.E. A thorough Monte-Carlo investigation of the performance of the diagnostic methods was conducted and generally supports the EIF approach as the recommended alternative. The phenotypic variance is the parameter whose associated regression diagnostic most frequently and correctly identified etiotic families in the models that were examined. An analysis of body mass index data from 402 individuals in 122 Muscatine, Iowa families is used to illustrate the methods. A Class A regressive model with a recessive major locus and equal mother-offspring and father-offspring correlations provided the best-fitting model. The proposed regression diagnostics identified up to 7.4% of the 122 families as etiotic. As a result of this investigation, case-deletion diagnostic assessment is now a practical component in the analysis of quantitative family data.
回归诊断方法是在Bonney提出的A类回归模型下开发和研究的[(1984)《美国医学遗传学杂志》18:731 - 749]。我们将表型分布不符合大多数家族相同遗传模型的家族称为病因家族。基于每次排除一个家族来检查每个模型参数估计值的变化来识别病因家族的精确病例删除方法非常耗时。我们提出了三种替代诊断方法:经验影响函数(EIF)、一步近似法和近似一步法。这些方法可以高效计算,并已被纳入现有的软件包S.A.G.E.。对诊断方法的性能进行了全面的蒙特卡罗研究,总体上支持将EIF方法作为推荐的替代方法。表型方差是其相关回归诊断在被检查模型中最频繁且正确识别病因家族的参数。对来自爱荷华州马斯卡廷122个家族的402名个体的体重指数数据进行分析,以说明这些方法。具有隐性主基因座且母婴和父婴相关性相等的A类回归模型提供了最佳拟合模型。所提出的回归诊断将122个家族中的7.4%识别为病因家族。作为这项研究的结果,病例删除诊断评估现在是定量家族数据分析中的一个实用组成部分。