McGraw R C, O'Connor H M
Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Med Educ. 1999 Aug;33(8):572-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00381.x.
Facing dramatic reductions of inpatient beds and fewer faculty tutors, the Queen's University medical school has had to consider alternatives to the traditional inpatient encounter for the early acquisition of clinical skills. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and impact on students of a model for a first-year clinical skills course, using exclusively standardized patients in place of inpatients, and using a smaller ratio of faculty to students.
Twenty volunteers were selected from the first-year class of 75 students to participate as the experimental group. The remaining 55 students formed the control group.
Queen's University medical school, Ontario, Canada.
First-year medical students.
In measures of student satisfaction with the amount of performance feedback received during the course, there was a non-significant trend towards greater satisfaction among the experimental group compared to the control group. This occurred despite a tutor to student ratio of 1.5:10 in the experimental group compared to 3:10 in the control group. In the student evaluation of their tutors, mean scores for the two groups were 4.28 for the experimental group and 4. 06 for the control group (P = 0.10). The mean OSCE scores for the two groups were 76.4 for the experimental group and 76.5 for the control group (P = 0.93). There is no practical or statistical difference in either of these two scores.
We conclude that this new model is feasible, was well received by the students and that the reduced tutor to student ratio and lack of inpatient encounters did not appear to adversely affect their learning.
面对住院病床数量的大幅减少和指导教师的减少,女王大学医学院不得不考虑采用替代传统住院实习的方式,以便学生尽早掌握临床技能。本研究的目的是调查一种针对一年级临床技能课程的模式的可行性及其对学生的影响,该模式完全使用标准化病人替代住院病人,并采用较小的师生比例。
从75名一年级学生中挑选出20名志愿者作为实验组。其余55名学生组成对照组。
加拿大安大略省女王大学医学院。
一年级医学生。
在学生对课程期间获得的表现反馈量的满意度衡量方面,与对照组相比,实验组的满意度有不显著的上升趋势。尽管实验组的师生比例为1.5:10,而对照组为3:10,但仍出现了这种情况。在学生对指导教师的评价中,实验组的平均分为4.28,对照组为4.06(P = 0.10)。两组的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)平均成绩分别为:实验组76.4分,对照组76.5分(P = 0.93)。这两个分数在实际情况或统计学上均无差异。
我们得出结论,这种新模式是可行的,受到了学生的好评,而且师生比例的降低和缺乏住院实习似乎并未对他们的学习产生不利影响。