Bowers Riley, Tunney Robert, Kelly Kim, Mills Beth, Trotta Katie, Wheeless C Neil, Drew Richard
Campbell University College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Buies Creek, North Carolina.
Harnett Health System, Lillington, North Carolina.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Aug;81(6):113. doi: 10.5688/ajpe816113.
To compare pre- and post-intervention test scores assessing insulin injection technique and counseling skills among P1 students with (intervention) or without (control) simulated patients, and to compare counseling checklist and knowledge retention test scores between groups. This study utilized cluster randomization. In addition to traditional instruction, the intervention group counseled a simulated patient on the use of insulin using the teach-back method. Test score changes from baseline were analyzed via two-sample t-test. The intervention group exhibited a significantly greater increase in knowledge test scores from baseline compared to the control group. Similar changes were seen in post-instruction counseling checklist scores and knowledge retention test scores from baseline. Simulated patient interactions, when added to traditional coursework within a P1 skills lab, improve student counseling aptitude and knowledge retention scores.
比较干预前后评估有(干预组)或无(对照组)模拟患者的P1学生胰岛素注射技术和咨询技能的测试成绩,并比较两组之间的咨询清单和知识保留测试成绩。本研究采用整群随机化。除传统教学外,干预组使用反馈教学法就胰岛素的使用向模拟患者提供咨询。通过双样本t检验分析与基线相比测试成绩的变化。与对照组相比,干预组知识测试成绩从基线起有显著更大的提高。从基线起,指导后咨询清单分数和知识保留测试成绩也出现了类似变化。在P1技能实验室的传统课程中增加模拟患者互动,可提高学生的咨询能力和知识保留分数。