• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准化患者、医学生和教师对纵向标准化患者体验的看法。

Perceptions of a longitudinal standardized patient experience by standardized patients, medical students, and faculty.

机构信息

a Department of Medicine and Science Education , Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell , Hempstead , NY , USA.

b Department of Science Education , Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell , Hempstead , NY , USA.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1548244. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1548244.

DOI:10.1080/10872981.2018.1548244
PMID:30560720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6282464/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Longitudinal standardized patient (LSP) experiences mimic clinical practice by allowing students to interact with standardized patients (SPs) over time. LSP cases facilitate practice, assessment, and feedback in clinical skills and foster an appreciation for the continuum of care.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to characterize the nature of relationship-building, feedback, and continuity among all stakeholders participating in a single LSP program.

DESIGN

We developed and implemented a novel LSP program. Students encountered two LSP characters six times each during the first 2 years of medical school, though continuity pairings of students, SPs, and faculty were frequently not possible. Focus groups were held with second-year medical students (N = 15), core faculty who coached these students in LSP encounters (N = 8), and SPs who had played the role of either LSP character (N = 10) participated. Results were analyzed thematically using a template analysis approach.

RESULTS

The longitudinal nature of the experience reinforced the importance of student growth over time, the key role of faculty and SPs in providing feedback, and the tension between feedback and assessment. Students reported that LSP cases encouraged practice and feedback. SPs felt wedded to the longitudinal characters. Continuity pairings were recommended by all stakeholders to increase authenticity and promote relationship-building.

CONCLUSION

Stakeholders observed that the LSP cases brought some sense of continuity missing in other clinical skills encounters which helped prepare students for patient care. Continuity pairings of students, faculty, and SPs were recommended to enhance relationship-building and feedback.

摘要

背景

纵向标准化患者 (LSP) 体验通过允许学生随着时间的推移与标准化患者 (SP) 互动,模拟临床实践。LSP 病例促进了临床技能的实践、评估和反馈,并培养了对护理连续性的认识。

目的

我们旨在描述参与单个 LSP 计划的所有利益相关者之间建立关系、反馈和连续性的性质。

设计

我们开发并实施了一项新的 LSP 计划。学生在医学院的前 2 年中,每个学生与两个 LSP 角色互动六次,尽管学生、SP 和教师的连续性配对通常是不可能的。参与研究的有第二年的医学生(N=15)、指导这些学生进行 LSP 互动的核心教师(N=8)和曾扮演 LSP 角色的 SP(N=10)。使用模板分析方法对结果进行了主题分析。

结果

该体验的纵向性质强化了学生随着时间的推移而成长的重要性、教师和 SP 在提供反馈方面的关键作用以及反馈和评估之间的紧张关系。学生报告说,LSP 病例鼓励实践和反馈。SP 觉得与纵向角色紧密相连。所有利益相关者都建议进行连续性配对,以增加真实性并促进关系建立。

结论

利益相关者观察到,LSP 病例带来了其他临床技能互动中缺失的一些连续性,这有助于为学生的患者护理做好准备。建议学生、教师和 SP 进行连续性配对,以加强关系建立和反馈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0e/6282464/8ae01f0640f4/ZMEO_A_1548244_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0e/6282464/8ae01f0640f4/ZMEO_A_1548244_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0e/6282464/8ae01f0640f4/ZMEO_A_1548244_F0001_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of a longitudinal standardized patient experience by standardized patients, medical students, and faculty.标准化患者、医学生和教师对纵向标准化患者体验的看法。
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1548244. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1548244.
2
Integrating 360° behavior-orientated feedback in communication skills training for medical undergraduates: concept, acceptance and students' self-ratings of communication competence.将360°行为导向反馈整合到医学本科生沟通技能培训中:概念、接受度及学生对沟通能力的自我评估
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0792-0.
3
Simulated patients' perspectives of and perceived role in medical students' professional identity development.模拟患者对医学生职业身份发展的看法及所感知到的自身作用。
Simul Healthc. 2015 Apr;10(2):85-91. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000082.
4
Assessing Advanced Communication Skills via Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Comparison of Faculty Versus Self, Peer, and Standardized Patient Assessors.通过客观结构化临床考试评估高级沟通技巧:教师与自我、同伴和标准化患者评估者的比较。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):294-307. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1704763. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
5
'Thinking on my feet': an improvisation course to enhance students' confidence and responsiveness in the medical interview.“随机应变”:一门提升学生在医学面试中自信心与反应能力的即兴课程。
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493466.
6
Early assessment of medical students' clinical skills.医学生临床技能的早期评估。
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1156. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00020.
7
Simulating the longitudinal doctor-patient relationship: experiences of simulated patients in successive consultations.模拟长期医患关系:模拟患者在连续会诊中的体验。
Med Educ. 2007 Sep;41(9):873-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02850.x.
8
Standardized patients in psychiatry - the best way to learn clinical skills?精神病学中的标准化病人——学习临床技能的最佳途径?
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 6;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1184-4.
9
Developing a Conversational Virtual Standardized Patient to Enable Students to Practice History-Taking Skills.开发一个对话式虚拟标准化患者,以帮助学生练习病史采集技能。
Simul Healthc. 2017 Apr;12(2):124-131. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000195.
10
Changing an existing OSCE to a teaching tool: the making of a teaching OSCE.将现有的客观结构化临床考试转变为一种教学工具:教学客观结构化临床考试的打造。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):932. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00036.

引用本文的文献

1
AI Patient Actor: An Open-Access Generative-AI App for Communication Training in Health Professions.人工智能患者角色:一款用于健康职业沟通训练的开放获取生成式人工智能应用程序。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Dec 13;35(1):25-27. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02250-2. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Standardized Patients in Medical Education: A Review of the Literature.医学教育中的标准化病人:文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Jul 17;15(7):e42027. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42027. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
The utilization of simulated patients for teaching and learning in the pharmacy curriculum: exploring pharmacy students' and recent alumni's perceptions using mixed-methods approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Using standardized patient encounters to teach longitudinal continuity of care in a family medicine clerkship.利用标准化患者诊疗案例在家庭医学实习中教授纵向连续性医疗服务。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0733-y.
2
The Longitudinal Standardized Patient Project: innovation from necessity.纵向标准化患者项目:因需创新。
Acad Med. 2015 Mar;90(3):317-20. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000565.
3
How to develop a competency-based examination blueprint for longitudinal standardized patient clinical skills assessments.
模拟患者在药学课程教学中的应用:混合方法探究药学学生和应届毕业生的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02977-1.
4
Description of a training protocol to improve research reproducibility for dignity therapy: an interview-based intervention.描述一项旨在提高尊严疗法研究再现性的培训方案:基于访谈的干预。
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Apr;20(2):178-188. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521000614.
5
Exploring how differently patients and clinical tutors see the same consultation: building evidence for inclusion of real patient feedback in medical education.探索患者和临床导师对同一会诊的看法有何不同:为将真实患者反馈纳入医学教育提供证据。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02654-3.
6
Multi-source evaluation of an educational program aimed at medical students for interviewing/taking the clinical history using standardized patients.多源评估一项针对医学生使用标准化患者进行访谈/采集临床病史的教育项目。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Feb 15;38(2):Doc40. doi: 10.3205/zma001436. eCollection 2021.
如何为纵向标准化患者临床技能评估制定基于能力的考试蓝图。
Med Teach. 2013 Nov;35(11):883-90. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.809408. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
4
A novel longitudinal geriatric medical student experience: using teaching objective structured clinical examinations.一种新颖的老年医学专业医学生体验:使用教学目标导向的临床考试。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Sep;59(9):1739-43; quiz 1743-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03538.x. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
5
A pragmatics' view of patient identification.一种关于患者身份识别的语用学观点。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19 Suppl 3:i13-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.036400. Epub 2010 May 31.
6
Standardized patient practices: initial report on the survey of US and Canadian medical schools.标准化病人实践:对美国和加拿大医学院校调查的初步报告。
Med Educ Online. 2009 Jun 29;14:7. doi: 10.3885/meo.2009.F0000208.
7
What students learn about professionalism from faculty stories: an "appreciative inquiry" approach.学生从教师故事中学习专业精神:一种“欣赏式探究”方法。
Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):118-23. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c42acd.
8
Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education.作为形成性评估的汇报:弥合医学教育中的表现差距
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;15(11):1010-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00248.x. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
9
The longitudinal simulated patient program: evaluations by teachers and students and feasibility.纵向模拟患者项目:教师和学生的评估以及可行性。
Med Teach. 2009 Jul;31(7):613-20. doi: 10.1080/01421590802334283.
10
Quality of standardised patient research reports in the medical education literature: review and recommendations.医学教育文献中标准化病人研究报告的质量:综述与建议
Med Educ. 2008 Apr;42(4):350-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02999.x. Epub 2008 Feb 20.