Rich M W, Nease R F
Geriatric Cardiology Program and the Division of General Medical Sciences, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(15):1690-700. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.15.1690.
Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in adults older than 65 years, and it is currently the most costly cardiovascular disorder in the United States, with estimated annual expenditures in excess of $20 billion. Recent studies have shown that selected pharmacological agents, behavioral interventions, and surgical therapies are associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure, but the cost implications of these diverse treatment modalities are not widely appreciated. In this review, a brief outline of cost-effectiveness analysis is provided, and current data on the cost-effectiveness of specific approaches to managing heart failure are discussed. Available evidence indicates that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, other vasodilators, digoxin, carvedilol, multidisciplinary heart failure management teams, and heart transplantation are all cost-effective approaches to treating heart failure; moreover, some of these interventions may result in net cost savings.
心力衰竭是65岁以上成年人住院治疗的主要原因,目前也是美国最昂贵的心血管疾病,估计每年支出超过200亿美元。最近的研究表明,某些药物、行为干预措施和手术治疗与心力衰竭患者临床预后的改善相关,但这些不同治疗方式的成本影响并未得到广泛认识。在本综述中,提供了成本效益分析的简要概述,并讨论了目前关于心力衰竭特定管理方法成本效益的现有数据。现有证据表明,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、其他血管扩张剂、地高辛、卡维地洛、多学科心力衰竭管理团队以及心脏移植都是治疗心力衰竭的成本效益方法;此外,其中一些干预措施可能会带来净成本节约。