Delea T E, Vera-Llonch M, Richner R E, Fowler M B, Oster G
Policy Analysis Inc., Brookline, Massachusetts 02445, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 15;83(6):890-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01066-2.
In this study, we examine the cost effectiveness of carvedilol for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). We use a Markov model to project life expectancy and lifetime medical care costs for a hypothetical cohort of patients with CHF who were assumed alternatively to receive carvedilol plus conventional therapy (digoxin, diuretics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) or conventional therapy alone. Patients on carvedilol were assumed to experience a reduced risk of death and hospitalization for CHF, which is consistent with findings from the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Trials Program. The benefits of carvedilol were projected under 2 alternative scenarios. In the first ("limited benefits"), benefits were conservatively assumed to persist for 6 months, the average duration of follow-up in these clinical trials, and then end abruptly. In the other ("extended benefits"), they were arbitrarily assumed to persist for 6 months and then decline gradually over time, vanishing by the end of 3 years. We estimated our model using data from the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Trials Program and other sources. For patients receiving conventional therapy alone, estimated life expectancy was 6.67 years; corresponding figures for those also receiving carvedilol were 6.98 and 7.62 years under the limited and extended benefits scenarios, respectively. Expected lifetime costs of CHF-related care were estimated to be $28,756 for conventional therapy, and $36,420 and $38,867 for carvedilol (limited and extended benefits, respectively). Cost per life-year saved for carvedilol was $29,477 and $12,799 under limited and extended benefits assumptions, respectively. The cost effectiveness of carvedilol for CHF compares favorably to that of other generally accepted medical interventions, even under conservative assumptions regarding the duration of therapeutic benefit.
在本研究中,我们考察了卡维地洛治疗慢性心力衰竭(CHF)的成本效益。我们使用马尔可夫模型来预测一组假设的CHF患者的预期寿命和终身医疗费用,这些患者被假定分别接受卡维地洛加传统疗法(地高辛、利尿剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂)或仅接受传统疗法。假定服用卡维地洛的患者CHF死亡和住院风险降低,这与美国卡维地洛心力衰竭试验项目的研究结果一致。卡维地洛的益处是在两种替代情景下预测的。在第一种情景(“有限益处”)中,保守地假定益处持续6个月,即这些临床试验的平均随访时间,然后突然终止。在另一种情景(“延长益处”)中,假定益处持续6个月,然后随时间逐渐下降,在3年末消失。我们使用来自美国卡维地洛心力衰竭试验项目和其他来源的数据对模型进行了估计。对于仅接受传统疗法的患者,估计预期寿命为6.67年;在有限益处和延长益处情景下,同时接受卡维地洛治疗的患者相应的预期寿命分别为6.98年和7.62年。CHF相关护理的预期终身费用估计传统疗法为28,756美元,卡维地洛为36,420美元和38,867美元(分别为有限益处和延长益处)。在有限益处和延长益处假设下,卡维地洛每挽救一个生命年的成本分别为29,477美元和12,799美元。即使在关于治疗益处持续时间的保守假设下,卡维地洛治疗CHF的成本效益也优于其他普遍接受的医学干预措施。