Krishnasamy M
Macmillan Practice Development Unit, Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care Studies, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Cancer Nurs. 1999 Aug;22(4):251-9. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199908000-00001.
This article reflects three nurses' views of the moral dimensions of their work in caring for patients receiving phases I and II of cancer clinical trials in a dedicated cancer clinical trials unit (CCTU). The nurses took part in a semistructured, tape-recorded, group interview in which they talked about any aspect of their work that they felt demonstrated its ethical or moral dimensions. The nurses were not employed as research nurses, but had chosen to specialize in cancer and palliative care in a CCTU environment. Three key themes emerged from the interview: being valued and moral distress; caring in a climate of scientific research; and care, cure, and consequences for moral reasoning. Working in an environment suffused with moral conflicts can be painful and damaging for the professionals involved. It would appear that if nurses are to function effectively, they need to be proactive in promoting an exploration of the role that emotions play in moral decision making and in examining the contribution of emotions to what they care about and why. A commitment to a shared understanding and valuing of divergent ethical reasoning in and across professional cultures of care and research paradigms also appears to be necessary. The terms "ethics" and "morals" are used interchangeably throughout this article.
本文反映了三位护士对其在一家专门的癌症临床试验单位(CCTU)护理接受癌症临床试验I期和II期患者工作中道德层面的看法。护士们参与了一次半结构化的、有录音的小组访谈,在访谈中他们谈论了工作中任何他们认为体现了伦理或道德层面的方面。这些护士并非受雇担任研究护士,而是选择在CCTU环境中专门从事癌症和姑息治疗工作。访谈中出现了三个关键主题:被重视与道德困扰;在科研氛围中关怀;以及关怀、治愈与道德推理的后果。在充满道德冲突的环境中工作对相关专业人员来说可能是痛苦且有害的。似乎如果护士想要有效地履行职责,他们需要积极主动地推动对情感在道德决策中所起作用的探索,并审视情感对他们所关心之事及其原因的贡献。在护理和研究范式的专业文化内部及之间,致力于对不同伦理推理达成共同理解并给予重视似乎也是必要的。在本文中,“伦理”和“道德”这两个术语可互换使用。