Rao P M, Rhea J T, Rao J A, Conn A K
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 1999 Jul;17(4):325-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(99)90077-3.
This study determined the diagnostic utility and hospital resource impact of plain abdominal radiography in emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. The authors reviewed medical records of 821 consecutive patients hospitalized for suspected appendicitis; 78% had plain abdominal radiography. Sixty-four percent had appendicitis. Radiographic findings were noted in 51% of patients with, and 47% of patients without appendicitis; no individual radiographic finding was sensitive or specific. Specific conditions were suggested in 10% of impressions; these failed to correlate with final clinical diagnoses 57% of the time. Hospital cost per abdominal radiograph was $67; cost per specific, correct radiographic diagnosis was $1,593. This is compared with $270 per appendiceal computed tomography scan (based on recent literature data). The authors conclude that plain abdominal radiographs in patients with suspected appendicitis are neither sensitive nor specific, are frequently misleading, are costly per specific and correct diagnosis, and should not be routinely obtained on patients with suspected appendicitis.
本研究确定了腹部平片对急诊科疑似阑尾炎患者的诊断效用及对医院资源的影响。作者回顾了821例因疑似阑尾炎住院的连续患者的病历;其中78%的患者进行了腹部平片检查。64%的患者患有阑尾炎。有阑尾炎的患者中51%有影像学表现,无阑尾炎的患者中47%有影像学表现;没有单一的影像学表现具有敏感性或特异性。10%的诊断提示了特定情况;这些情况在57%的时间里与最终临床诊断不相关。每张腹部平片的医院成本为67美元;每例特定的、正确的影像学诊断成本为1593美元。与之相比,阑尾计算机断层扫描每次的成本为270美元(基于近期文献数据)。作者得出结论,疑似阑尾炎患者的腹部平片既不敏感也不特异,经常产生误导,每次特定且正确诊断的成本很高,不应该对疑似阑尾炎患者常规进行检查。