Suppr超能文献

无牙下颌骨中3种不同的非潜入式骨内种植体的比较:临床报告

A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.

作者信息

Røynesdal A K, Ambjørnsen E, Haanaes H R

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):543-8.

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to investigate the outcome of 3 different types of endosseous, nonsubmerged implants in the anterior part of the mandible. Fourteen older edentulous patients, 10 females and 4 males, were included. All participants received 3 different types of endosseous implants in the anterior mandible: 1 titanium plasma-sprayed cylindric implant (4 mm in diameter), 1 titanium cylindric implant with hydroxyapatite (HA) coating (4 mm in diameter), and 1 standard threaded titanium implant (3.75 mm in diameter). The 3 types of implants were originally designed to be placed in a 2-step surgical procedure. However, at this stage all implants were simultaneously provided with a temporary abutment that penetrated the mucosa. Three months later the temporary abutments were replaced by ball abutments, which were connected to an overdenture. At 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery, marginal bone resorption and Periotest values were recorded. Two patients died within the 2 first postoperative years. Five of 42 implants (11.9%) failed to osseointegrate. After 3 years, marginal bone resorption around titanium plasma-sprayed implants was significantly greater than that seen around both HA-coated and threaded titanium implants. Threaded titanium implants also had significantly better scores for marginal bone resorption than the HA-coated implants. Periotest values for HA-coated cylinders were significantly lower than test values for the other implants after 3 years (P < .05). The conclusion from this investigation is that nonsubmerged implants showed impaired prognoses compared to implants placed according to the 2-stage concept. Marginal bone resorption around titanium plasma-sprayed cylindric implants was clearly increased compared to the 2 other implant systems. Periotest values for HA-coated cylindric implants were superior to titanium plasma-sprayed and pure titanium implant surfaces.

摘要

这项前瞻性临床研究的目的是调查3种不同类型的下颌前部骨内非潜入式种植体的效果。纳入了14名老年无牙患者,其中10名女性,4名男性。所有参与者在下颌前部接受了3种不同类型的骨内种植体:1枚钛等离子喷涂圆柱形种植体(直径4毫米)、1枚带羟基磷灰石(HA)涂层的钛圆柱形种植体(直径4毫米)和1枚标准螺纹钛种植体(直径3.75毫米)。这3种植体最初设计为分两步手术植入。然而,在这个阶段,所有种植体同时配备了穿透黏膜的临时基台。3个月后,临时基台被球形基台取代,并连接到覆盖义齿上。在术后12、24和36个月,记录边缘骨吸收和牙周探针值。2名患者在术后的头2年内死亡。42枚种植体中有5枚(11.9%)未能实现骨整合。3年后,钛等离子喷涂种植体周围的边缘骨吸收明显大于HA涂层种植体和螺纹钛种植体周围的边缘骨吸收。螺纹钛种植体的边缘骨吸收评分也明显优于HA涂层种植体。3年后,HA涂层圆柱形种植体的牙周探针值明显低于其他种植体的测试值(P < 0.05)。这项调查的结论是,与按照两阶段概念植入的种植体相比,非潜入式种植体的预后较差。与其他两种种植系统相比,钛等离子喷涂圆柱形种植体周围的边缘骨吸收明显增加。HA涂层圆柱形种植体的牙周探针值优于钛等离子喷涂和纯钛种植体表面。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验