Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死患者接受链激酶治疗后长达7.5年的体液免疫和细胞免疫反应。

Humoral and cellular immune responses up to 7.5 years after administration of streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Squire I B, Lawley W, Fletcher S, Holme E, Hillis W S, Hewitt C, Woods K L

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Leicester, Leicester, U.K.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1999 Sep;20(17):1245-52. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1528.

Abstract

AIMS

Administration of streptokinase results in an immunological response which may lead to increased risk of anaphylactic reaction or reduced thrombolytic efficacy on repeat administration. For these reasons current recommendations suggest that streptokinase should not be given up to 1 year after first administration. We sought to define the profile of both the circulating antibody and T-cell response to streptokinase in patients who had received streptokinase up to 7.5 years previously following acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Neutralizing anti-streptokinase antibody and total anti-streptokinase IgG were measured in 219 patients who had suffered acute myocardial infarction between 12 and 90 months previously and had received streptokinase. T-cell response to streptokinase was assessed by in-vitro proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (n=234). Data on all parameters were available in 184 patients. Controls (n=22) had suffered acute myocardial infarction between 73 and 84 months previously but had not received thrombolytic therapy.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, anti-streptokinase antibodies were elevated at all time periods from 12 to 90 months after streptokinase treatment. Total anti-streptokinase titres showed the expected correlation with neutralizing anti-streptokinase antibodies (P<0.0001). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed a vigorous in-vitro proliferative response to streptokinase 6 days after treatment (P=0.05 vs pre-treatment), but this was not detectable at 6 weeks or subsequently.

CONCLUSION

There is as yet no evidence of a time limit beyond which administration of streptokinase on a second occasion can be regarded as safe and likely to be effective. Measurement of neutralizing anti-streptokinase or total anti-streptokinase IgG titre appear to provide equivalent information regarding the antibody status of a population. Further studies are required regarding the apparent lack of peripheral blood mononuclear cells responsiveness in patients previously exposed to streptokinase.

摘要

目的

使用链激酶会引发免疫反应,这可能导致过敏反应风险增加,或在重复使用时降低溶栓效果。基于这些原因,目前的建议是首次使用链激酶后1年内不应再次使用。我们试图确定在急性心肌梗死后接受链激酶治疗长达7.5年的患者中,循环抗体和T细胞对链激酶的反应情况。

方法

在219例12至90个月前发生急性心肌梗死并接受过链激酶治疗的患者中,检测中和性抗链激酶抗体和总抗链激酶IgG。通过外周血单个核细胞(n = 234)的体外增殖评估T细胞对链激酶的反应。184例患者可获得所有参数的数据。对照组(n = 22)在73至84个月前发生急性心肌梗死,但未接受溶栓治疗。

结果

与对照组相比,链激酶治疗后12至90个月的所有时间段,抗链激酶抗体均升高。总抗链激酶滴度与中和性抗链激酶抗体呈预期的相关性(P < 0.0001)。治疗后6天,外周血单个核细胞对链激酶表现出强烈的体外增殖反应(与治疗前相比,P = 0.05),但在6周或之后未检测到。

结论

尚无证据表明存在一个时间限制,超过该时间再次使用链激酶可被视为安全且可能有效。测量中和性抗链激酶或总抗链激酶IgG滴度似乎能提供关于人群抗体状态的等效信息。对于先前接触过链激酶的患者外周血单个核细胞明显缺乏反应性的情况,还需要进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验