Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Transl Res. 2020 Nov;225:82-94. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 17.
The use of fibrinolytic agents in acute pulmonary embolism (PE), first described over 50 years ago, hastens the resolution of RV stain, leading to earlier hemodynamic improvement. However, this benefit comes at the increased risk of bleeding. The strongest indication for fibrinolysis is in high-risk PE, or that characterized by sustained hypotension, while its use in patients with intermediate-risk PE remains controversial. Fibrinolysis is generally not recommended for routine use in intermediate-risk PE, although most guidelines advise that it may be considered in patients with signs of acute decompensation and an overall low bleeding risk. The efficacy of fibrinolysis often varies significantly between patients, which may be at least partially explained by several factors found to promote resistance to fibrinolysis. Ultimately, treatment decisions should carefully weigh the risks and benefits of the individual clinical scenario at hand, including the overall severity, the patient's bleeding risk, and the presence of factors known to promote resistance to fibrinolysis. This review aims to further explore the use of fibrinolytic agents in the treatment of PE including specific indications, outcomes, and special considerations.
纤溶药物在急性肺栓塞(PE)中的应用,最早可追溯到 50 多年前,可加速 RV 充盈缺损的消退,从而更早地改善血液动力学。然而,这种获益是以增加出血风险为代价的。纤溶治疗的最强适应证是高危 PE,或持续性低血压特征的 PE,而其在中危 PE 患者中的应用仍存在争议。尽管大多数指南建议对于有急性失代偿和整体低出血风险的患者可以考虑纤溶治疗,但一般不建议常规用于中危 PE。纤溶治疗在患者之间的疗效差异很大,这至少部分可以通过发现的几种促进纤溶抵抗的因素来解释。最终,治疗决策应仔细权衡手头患者的具体临床情况的风险和获益,包括整体严重程度、患者出血风险以及已知可促进纤溶抵抗的因素。本文旨在进一步探讨纤溶药物在 PE 治疗中的应用,包括具体的适应证、结局和特殊考虑。