Claiborne N, Krause T M, Heilman A E, Leung P
University of Houston, Graduate School of Social Work, TX, USA.
Soc Work Health Care. 1999;28(3):77-94. doi: 10.1300/j010v28n03_05.
This paper is a reliability and validity test of the Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ) 2.0. In addition, the Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI) is compared with the HSQ 2.0 to assess concurrent validity. The study is unique because these instruments are assessed for the first time using a sample of chronic back patients. Practitioners will therefore now be able to evaluate important quality of life issues and treatment changes in this population. The HSQ 2.0 was generally found to be valid for these patients. However, two scale domains were not differentiated due to unique characteristics of spinal disease patients. The QOLI, due to the limitation of measuring only psychological well-being, did not measure problems specific to back patients.
本文是对健康状况问卷(HSQ)2.0的信度和效度测试。此外,还将生活质量量表(QOLI)与HSQ 2.0进行比较以评估同时效度。这项研究具有独特性,因为这些工具首次使用慢性背痛患者样本进行评估。因此,从业者现在能够评估该人群重要的生活质量问题和治疗变化。总体而言,HSQ 2.0对这些患者是有效的。然而,由于脊柱疾病患者的独特特征,有两个量表领域未被区分。由于QOLI仅测量心理健康状况的局限性,它并未测量背痛患者特有的问题。