Deyo R A, Diehl A K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Sep;8(6):635-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198309000-00009.
Techniques for assessing daily function in Patients with back pain are generally crude and limited in scope. We therefore examined a "health status" questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) to assess its measurement characteristics in such patients. Eighty patients with mechanical low-back pain completed the SIP and a physical examination at a walk-in visit and again three weeks later. Test-retest reliability of the SIP was substantial. Biologic validity was confirmed by significant correlations with age, pain duration, spine flexion, straight leg raising, and pain severity. Validity of psychosocial subscales was confirmed by significant associations with patient anxiety and psychiatric problems. Scores changed in the expected directions when patients were evaluated three weeks later. The SIP is thus valid, reliable, sensitive to clinical changes, and comprehensively assesses a wide range of dysfunctions.
评估背痛患者日常功能的技术通常比较粗糙,且范围有限。因此,我们研究了一份“健康状况”问卷——疾病影响量表(SIP),以评估其在此类患者中的测量特性。80例机械性下背痛患者在一次门诊就诊时完成了SIP和体格检查,并在三周后再次进行检查。SIP的重测信度很高。通过与年龄、疼痛持续时间、脊柱前屈、直腿抬高和疼痛严重程度的显著相关性,证实了生物学效度。心理社会分量表的效度通过与患者焦虑和精神问题的显著关联得到证实。当在三周后对患者进行评估时,分数朝着预期的方向变化。因此,SIP是有效的、可靠的,对临床变化敏感,并且能全面评估广泛的功能障碍。