• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[日间手术中儿童的口服多美康术前用药]

[Oral dormicum premedication of children in day surgery].

作者信息

Ostreĭkov I F, Pivovarov S A, Milenin V V, Shishkova M V, Vasil'ev Ia I

出版信息

Anesteziol Reanimatol. 1999 May-Jun(3):12-4.

PMID:10458029
Abstract

Thirty-four patients aged 5-14 years were observed, divided into age groups OF 5-8 and 8-14 years. Cardiovascular function was evaluated by central hemodynamic parameters and cardiointervalography. Changes in external respiration parameters were studied. The efficacy of premedication was assessed by objective parameters and by clinical signs. Each patient was examined 4 times at the following stages: 1) before premedication; 2) at the 10th min; 3) at the 20th min; and 4) at the 30th min. Oral premedication with dormicum in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg did not affect heart rate or arterial pressure. By the 20th min it notably decreased total peripheral resistance, significantly decreased the respiratory volume, increased respiration rate, and decreased sympathetic tone in younger children. In older children the premedication virtually did not affect total peripheral resistance and facilitated heart work, increased the respiratory volume, rarefied the respiratory rate, and did not affect the autonomic regulation balance. Younger children fell asleep without excitation or negativism; 35.2% developed psychomotor reactions. In older group the effect was good in 71.1% children, the rest had "apparitions" starting from the 17th min: doubling of the staff's faces, white spiders, or white moths.

摘要

观察了34名5至14岁的患者,分为5至8岁和8至14岁两个年龄组。通过中心血流动力学参数和心搏间期描记法评估心血管功能。研究了外呼吸参数的变化。通过客观参数和临床体征评估术前用药的疗效。每位患者在以下阶段接受4次检查:1)术前用药前;2)第10分钟时;3)第20分钟时;4)第30分钟时。口服0.5mg/kg剂量的多美康进行术前用药对心率或动脉血压没有影响。到第20分钟时,它显著降低了总外周阻力,显著降低了呼吸量,增加了呼吸频率,并降低了年幼儿童的交感神经张力。在年长儿童中,术前用药实际上并未影响总外周阻力,而是促进了心脏工作,增加了呼吸量,降低了呼吸频率,并且未影响自主调节平衡。年幼儿童入睡时没有兴奋或抵触情绪;35.2%出现了精神运动反应。在年长组中,71.1%的儿童效果良好,其余儿童从第17分钟开始出现“幻觉”:工作人员的脸加倍、白色蜘蛛或白色飞蛾。

相似文献

1
[Oral dormicum premedication of children in day surgery].[日间手术中儿童的口服多美康术前用药]
Anesteziol Reanimatol. 1999 May-Jun(3):12-4.
2
[Oral premedication in ambulatory surgical otorhinolaryngology in children].[儿童耳鼻咽喉科门诊手术中的口服术前用药]
Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2002 Jul-Aug(4):44-5.
3
[Comparative study of sublingual midazolam with oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia].[小儿麻醉前用药中舌下含服咪达唑仑与口服咪达唑仑的比较研究]
Masui. 2008 Oct;57(10):1227-32.
4
[Study of midazolam for premedication in oral and maxillofacial surgery].[咪达唑仑用于口腔颌面外科术前用药的研究]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2003 Jun;12(3):170-3.
5
Tramadol drops in children: analgesic efficacy, lack of respiratory effects, and normal recovery times.儿童曲马多滴剂:镇痛效果、无呼吸影响及正常恢复时间
Anesth Prog. 1999 Summer;46(3):91-6.
6
A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.小儿麻醉前用药中鼻内给予右美托咪定与口服咪达唑仑的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jun;106(6):1715-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816c8929.
7
[Oral and rectal premedication of children with midazolam]].咪达唑仑用于儿童口腔和直肠的术前用药
Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2002;27(3):60-7.
8
Evaluation of relatively low dose of oral transmucosal ketamine premedication in children: a comparison with oral midazolam.儿童口服黏膜下低剂量氯胺酮术前用药的评估:与口服咪达唑仑的比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Aug;15(8):643-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01513.x.
9
[Oral premedication with midasolam and ketamine in children with neurosurgical diseases].咪达唑仑和氯胺酮用于神经外科疾病患儿的口服术前用药
Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2010 Jan-Feb(1):6-10.
10
A comparison of oral midazolam, oral tramadol, and intranasal sufentanil premedication in pediatric patients.小儿患者口服咪达唑仑、口服曲马多和鼻内舒芬太尼术前用药的比较。
J Opioid Manag. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):74-8. doi: 10.5055/jom.2007.0043.